You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: What becoming a brutal dictator can tell us about living
It's interesting, I wonder is it contradictory really. I read this by poster agj on a forum when I was researching this post:
In my opinion, the fact that those games reflect fascism is only because they follow the same structure as most games in any genre: winning means defeating the opposition, and in this case it's nations involved. There's also the fact that history usually gives great importance to the various armed conflicts among civilizations.
Maybe it doesn't mean much and we're just playing a game 🤔 But then again it does have meaning for some people. I'm going to think more about that an explore it next time I think.
What the subject of the forum says is precise, because in almost all these games what matters is not to generate greater national progress, social development, etc, etc. The important thing is really to achieve domination and conquer countries, win the war, where the totalitarian countries showed greater mobility and more flexibility.
Although I do not think that the impact that these games can generate on people are neither too many nor too negative, even more important is their environment.