Silencing and censoring is not a part of the scientific method, but it is a part of the scientific consensus, which has priority over the method in question.

Scientific method does not apply to religion, or it would be called religious method. You apply to religion a method that hardly even applies to science, as I have already proven to you, to religion, which has nothing to do with it. Actually do study religion. Every religion have other methods. You wouldn't apply Christian method or Wiccan method to science (not even scientific method for reasons I enumerated above), why do you insist on applying scientific method to religion?

You told me once you had no interest in creating a new religion. (Even thought you did attempt it once, but you failed to state what it was about). Some people greater than you do study theory of religion (also called comparative religion) and are able to draw conclusions from it that are not suppressed by scientific consensus.

I do not understand the picture you paste under the article. I thing you even failed to state its source, which is against Steemit's rules. Is the man a scientist or a priest? If a scientists, it doesn't really matter who that is, as science is driven by consensus, not reason, but if it is a priest, which religion it is? I do not recognise their attire. Is it any particular religion? Is the man a flat-Earther or a Star Trek fan? The picture does not help to clarify which religion you are against.