CoinCube replied:

Economics and game theory are ultimately driven by morality and ethics.

Incorrect. The superrationality is driven by a holistic Nash equilibrium on a superscale game that supersedes the game it contains within it.

I didn’t disagree about aiming for superrationality:

What may work better now is genuine concepts about how to cooperate with others in a way that generates prosperity and maximizes the Nash equilibrium of individuals in the accelerated cultural and technological evolution.

Religion is just an encoding of superrationality (i.e. the Nash equilibrium of a superseding game) as I had wrote:

Religion works because it encodes game theory and economics

Superrationality is not forever limited to a form of encoding that requires:

“don’t drink goats milk on Thursdays” and “universe loves you if you love the universe” sort of religious mind control

We’re aiming for higher levels of cooperation. Some might claim that is good and that good is what a God wants, but others might not need to introduce the concept of heaven and afterlife in order to motivate the cooperation.

CoinCube wrote:

The Universe is finite. You are correct that this necessitates something exists (mathematically) “outside” the bound, and this something must by definition be unbounded.

I argue that no one has proven the Universe is finite, nor will they ever do so.