Judge Delays Decision to Unseal Charges Against Julian Assange
The suit by RCFP to unseal federal charges against Julian Assange was supposed to be decided today. Judge Leonie M. Brinkema from the Eastern District of Virginia heard arguments to unseal the charges, but delayed making a decision on the case. She will hear more from the lawyers representing Assange and from the prosecutors who want to keep the seal in place.
![](https://steemitimages.com/640x0/https://i.imgur.com/Rm57CbR.jpg)
Source
The 1993 Clinton-era appointed judge said "this is an interesting case, to say the least. Obviously, some kind of mistake has been made." But that doesn't mean she will unseal the charges. Prosecutor Gordon Kromber previously said:
"In either event, the government is not required to publicly acknowledge which of those two possibilities happens to be the case with respect to any individual. The First Amendment does not require the government to confirm or deny the existence of criminal charges in this case."
Despite the prosecutors playing the "neither confirm or deny" game, it's obvious there are charges. Surprisingly, the judge even admitted so saying his name being exposed shows "the fact that he has been charged":
"Given the fact that this statement does appear in a government filing, and given that everybody knows where this man is, what is the rationale for sealing the charge."
She was referring to the widely known screw up from United States Attorney G. Zachary Terwilliger who used documents to seal Assange's charges as a template for another case but left Assange's name there:
The complaint, supporting affidavit, and arrest warrant, as well as this motion and the proposed order, would need to remain sealed until Assange is arrested in connection with the charges in the criminal complaint and can therefore no longer evade or avoid arrest and extradition in this matter.
![](https://steemitimages.com/640x0/https://i.imgur.com/lCJgajh.jpg)
Source
It sounds like Judge Brinkema might be leaning towards unsealing the charges, since what's the point of keeping them hidden given that everyone knows the charges are there, who they are for, and where the person is. She asked the prosecutor:
"Everyone knows where he is, so what’s the rationale for keeping it under seal?"
Yet, she also mentioned not knowing of any other case where the government unsealed charges before a defendant was arrested.
Director Katie Townsend of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, the organization who filed suit against the government and demanding access to "any criminal complaint, indictment or other charging documents", said "the filing, inadvertent or not ... confirms the speculation" of criminal charges against Assange. "At a minimum, Mr. Assange knows that he has been charged," and that legal justifications to keep the seal in place have "evaporated."
Prosecutor Gordon Kromber argued to the judge that "any discussion of why it would be sealed cannot be done in a public forum. This court ... doesn’t know what needs to be said." Brinkema seems to agree, reasoning that in cases with multiple defendants a seal can last beyond one defendants arrest. Her main concern is "is making sure that person is brought to justice". If a seal needs to be kept in place to ensure that, then it will be. Brinkema said:
"... there’s no question the public has a right to see charging documents, but that right doesn’t apply before an arrest has been made."
The criminal case and charges against Assange may not only include him. If they extend beyond Assange, then the charges will surely remain sealed. What's interesting is that Assange isn't part of the case to have the charges unsealed. His lawyer, Barry Pollack, watched the proceeding however, and said his client isn't opposed to the unsealing "Mr. Assange as a journalist is certainly aligned with the Reporters Committee", but won't intervene to have them unsealed either.
Judge Brinkema will allow both sides to present additional information next week before she reaches a final decision on the matter. The case of criminally charging Assange for leaking government documents is of great importance. Whistleblowers and leaks shows us the dark side of our society many wouldn't know about otherwise. If leaks become criminalize through a precedent set in a criminal case against Assange, it would lead to greater silencing of people trying to shed light on the ugly darkness. What kind of free society would be left going forward from there?
References:
- No Decision at Hearing to Unseal Julian Assange’s Charges, Court to Reconvene Next Week
- Federal judge delays decision on unsealing ‘interesting’ Julian Assange case
- Assange Secretly Charged by U.S., Sealed Court Documents Reveal in Copy-Paste Bungle
- U.S. Prosecutors Fight to Keep Assange's Charges Sealed, Saying Media Has 'No Legal Right' to Know
Thank you for your time and attention. Peace.
If you appreciate and value the content, please consider: Upvoting, Sharing or Reblogging below.
me for more content to come!
My goal is to share knowledge, truth and moral understanding in order to help change the world for the better. If you appreciate and value what I do, please consider supporting me as a Steem Witness by voting for me at the bottom of the Witness page.
![](https://steemitimages.com/640x0/https://i.imgur.com/R81YLbN.jpg)
It is time ot begin holding those the leaks have been exposing to account, and those who would protect them. Just as the story of Jesus defending the woman by writing the persecutors crimes it is time things got uncomfortable for them. Let them stay behind locked doors in fear the way Assange has.
Yes, they should be held accountable... but it hasn't happened yet. The authorities won't do it because they are in cahoots and don't want to legitimize the exposure of darkness they are party to.
Something has to give soon...it has to...doesn't it?
I am shocked it hasn't already. I really thought the standoff at Bundy Ranch was the moment it was here, but sadly I was wrong. The feds backed off and soon enough the heroes became complacent and business as usual.
Then they ran the Hitler script and got Trump elected, and now they have the Q stuff and "rumors" of sealed indictments while the same evil fucks still visit their luxury resorts and spas, laughing at how gullible people are to fall for the same script again and again.
Re: the 'q' thing...
I'm still looking at it optimistically - not from logic, but more of a 'it's the last hope we have before real meltdown'.
if it doesn't turn up something soon, there will be a lot of gun owner seriously pissed off..
(the intention? maybe..)
Yep, the desperation script. Works again and again as it gives rational people who want peace a reason to sit back and wait for others to bring the justice they need. Wait and look for small crumbs doled out that change is on the horizon as they laugh and get richer off our sweat and the blood of innocents.
I have very little skin in the game (no family, no kids)...
Any dire situation will be much less of a problem to me personally - and I choose to feel optimistic at the moment, in this current cycle (2 years or so ) - it's the best logical option.
The only thing I can do is write..
I do ask myself the question as to why I'm so bothered even. like I said, no skin in the game...
I blame my family - I grew up in a liars haven, and it's something that I've detested all my life...
....Feels like I'm fighting my family, but on a bigger scale!
(fortunately this lot are no where near as bad as my family! lol
I'm not convinced that the whole Assange episode (today I mean), isn't just a way to get him into protective custody, to blow the whole thing wide open...
Saying that....I'm totally confused as to Assange's motivations... (a white hat or black hat, kind of thing).
His history from childhood is a little bizarre. (very mkultra -esque possibly)...
That would be good if he could get protected and blow the lid of some more shit. MKUltra you say? His motivations to leak info?
I have no idea - but he did grow up in very weird environment..
....and interviews that he had rang true of a government security operation ...
I'll try to dig out the you tube/link...
this is the first of three- I'm sure you're capable of tracking them down... lol
I'm not saying it's what I think - ( I don't know what I think).... just more information to ponder on...
Part of me thinks this is all distraction but from what I don’t know. They have been salivating at the thought of bringing him to jail for years, why the slip up now? Doesn’t add up to me.
Everything is a distraction, we should go back to doing homework and watching TV :P People make mistakes, but yes sometimes mistakes are planted to appear like mistakes... if that's the case, what's the motive to do so? Why bring it to light when the goal is to keep it hidden until he is arrested?
Curated for #informationwar (by @openparadigm)
Our purpose is to encourage posts discussing Information War, Propaganda, Disinformation and other false narratives. We currently have over 7,500 Steem Power and 20+ people following the curation trail to support our mission.
Join our discord and chat with 250+ fellow Informationwar Activists.
Join our brand new reddit! and start sharing your Steemit posts directly to The_IW, via the share button on your Steemit post!!!
Connect with fellow Informationwar writers in our Roll Call! InformationWar - Leadership/Contributing Writers/Supporters: Roll Call
Ways you can help the @informationwar
Hi @krnel!
Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your UA account score is currently 7.267 which ranks you at #65 across all Steem accounts.
Your rank has not changed in the last three days.
In our last Algorithmic Curation Round, consisting of 241 contributions, your post is ranked at #25.
Evaluation of your UA score:
Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server