You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: No Way The Earth Is Flat 1, I saw the proof with my own eyes
The only problem with this observation is that you are using your naked eye. Go and purchase a Nikon p900 camera that allows an 83x zoom, and what you will find is that you can zoom in and see the base of all of these buildings.
I know it seems unlikely... however, the law of perspective contains the 'Vanishing point' directly at the center where all lines converge.
Go get the camera or just youtube some videos where people prove this using the camera.
It's just an illusion using your naked eye. The buildings bases are visible when you zoom in!
Can't you see the photo posted with this blog?
Yes I can see it, but did you read what I wrote?
Go on youtube right now, and watch a P900 camera zoom in and it will show the buildings bases. I explained to you that the Vanishing Point is the reason for the inability to see the bases. The top of the water and the base of the buildings merge at the V.P. forming an illusion. This illusion is caused by the inability of the eye to see forever.
There are tons of examples of the 83x zooming camera pulling in objects that are outside of the perception of the human eye.
I did see those videos and none of them can zoom in and show the bottom of the buildings. On the other hand, there is a video called "Flat Earth Dishonesty: Zooming in on the horizon, Toronto" clearly shows the same view after zoomed in.
Look at this video and read the description. Assuming the math checks out, this would prove the curvature is either nonexistent or much less sloped than previously thought - aka the diameter of the earth is much larger...
Even this video shows the bottom of the buildings being blocked. Look at the comparison at 1:48. And the calculation on the description it's totally wrong. Where do these people come up with such formula. Anyone can open a website for calculating something with wrong formulas, probably even with an agenda.
The bottom of the buildings isn't the strongest point this video makes. She is making the point that the entire building should be below the horizon. With enough curve, and by the way the formula is 8 inches per mile squared, so 8x(M2), that means the entire damn building should be below water... We're talking exponential curve, at just a few miles it comes out to thousands of feet and this is taken from the diameter of the earth using curve trigonometry.
Now, with that being said - the bases of the building isn't as important as the entire building should be under the horizon and isn't...
Those numbers only prove there is something wrong with the data, such as the true size of the earth. Our main point here is the earth is not flat. Just look at the sun ,it sets entirely behind the horizon. That is plain and clear. If there is a horizon that can block something entirely, there is curvature.
OK - I will agree at this point. There is something wrong with the data.. But if that's true, then it's being kept from us. You cannot deny that. If satellites and space stations are orbiting earth, they absolutely know the true size... OR they aren't actually orbiting and it's a hoax.
One or the other...