Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     7 years ago 

    Your evidence of a spinning ball please? :)

    $0.00
      Reply
      [-]
       7 years ago 

      The shadow of the earth on the moon during a lunar eclipse plus various experiments that have been done demonstrating optically or otherwise angle of movement and speed. The Omega 3-6-9 Ratios and all other phenomena that resolves around the equator as distinct from moving away from the equator. The predictive power of the "spinning ball" model, the numerous people who are involved with space, and the lack of evidence to the contrary. The "Spinning Ball" A, the moon, and "Spinning Ball" B, the sun, the numerous moons and the planets in our immediate vicinity, The horizon, sun set and sun rise, circumnavigation and satellite imagery, gigabites upon gigabytes of pixels, of galaxies and galaxies, of planets, moons and even ufos. Also the fact that there isn't one picture of flat earth, not one picture of the 200 foot wall of ice from space, showing conclusively the wall, which would be the single evidence required, and considering there are drones, there is no reason why people who really believe their observations are correct, that there is an endless wall of ice encircling us, why haven't they provided one shred of evidence , someone in Argentina flying to and from Argentina should be able to confirm the endless wall of ice with one photo. A grand conspiracy, in spite of all the different facts that are explained by heliocentric model.

      $0.00
        Reply
        [-]
         7 years ago 

        Which experiments exactly?

        $0.00
          Reply
          [-]
           7 years ago 

          You were linked one of the experiments, there are others:
          http://www.conspiracyoflight.com/Sagnac/SagnacEarth.html

          In this series of experiments we were successful in detecting earth's diurnal rotational motion using a purely optical method. The resolution is quite reasonable considering the low cost design and implementation. The device demonstrates that the speed of light is not constant in the Sagnac interferometer from the perspective of the laboratory observer, even though both the observer and the interferometer are not moving in the laboratory frame. When the device is angled at 45 degrees with the z-axis facing north, the clockwise beam travels faster than the counter-clockwise beam, leading to a phase shift between the two beams at the photodetector. Because the clockwise beam is faster, according to C=fl, the wavelength of the clockwise beam appears longer than the counter-clockwise beam when measured in the laboratory frame. The difference in the velocities of the two beams amounts to the angular velocity of the loop with respect to the pole of the earth (the ECI frame). This is approximately 3.6 E -5 m/s. This amounts to a fringe shift of only 4.2 E -5 between the two beams. However, due to the high amplification used in this system, we are able to detect fringe shifts on the order of 0.7 E -6 of a fringe per mV.

          $0.00
            Reply
            [-]
             7 years ago 

            I wonder, do you have nothing to say about all the other reasons why its a sphere, or you think that you can cast doubt with one question and hope to dismiss the plethora of reasons I gave, good luck.

            $0.00
              Reply

              Coin Marketplace

              STEEM 0.21
              TRX 0.13
              JST 0.030
              BTC 67334.64
              ETH 3519.34
              USDT 1.00
              SBD 3.10