Flat earther is annoyed
No joke, he jumps in on a post full of disparaging remarks and attacks on me, and has a problem with me calling his whack ass theory of "earth is flat and painted on the inside of a toroid, it has 6 dimensions but it's actually 2, but it requires 6 dimensions to depict it, whack and telling him he's an idiot. Then he lies and says I avoid the hard question of why the horizon is always at eye level when in an airplane or on Mount Everest, as if I did not thoroughly explain that the scale is that big that from that altitude the horizon going down is hardly observable and linked him to my previous comments where I illustrated the exact shape and scale.
Whack ass clowns, idiots trapped in Dunning-Kruger mindset. So sad.
Don't believe me, check it out, tell me I'm wrong :
Posted using Partiko Android
Thank you so much for being an awesome Partiko user! We have just given you a free upvote!
The more Partiko Points you have, the more likely you will get a free upvote from us! You can earn 30 Partiko Points for each post made using Partiko, and you can make 10 Points per comment.
One easy way to earn Partiko Point fast is to look at posts under the #introduceyourself tag and welcome new Steem users by commenting under their posts using Partiko!
If you have questions, don't feel hesitant to reach out to us by sending us a Partiko Message, or leaving a comment under our post!
this is strange ideas, i don't follow it. but..
eric dubay. 200 proofs. he is on steemit now. @ericdubay
the only fools are those that don't take the time to examine it.
why are flat earthers more educated than round earthers about how we came to think it is round and why those proofs are inaccurate?
why does the flat earth society get all the media attention... while the flat earth science is actually the real deal...
i've had many a debate on this subject, and the goal posts keep being changed.
the truth is obvious to those that care to find it.
I haven't meet one single person that was for flat earth that could explain lunar eclipse or the horizon. 2000 proofs but flat earth does not have a horizon and to think that a massive conspiracy over the shape of the world has been going on for 300+ or more years without any discernable objective and without any single person blowing the whistle or any deathbed confessions is ridiculous AF. Also I don't know what you mean "don't take time to examine it" as if you know Jack shit about me concerning that, but do freely make assertion and insinuating nonsense about me concerning this topic, because nobody expected you to make a succinctly and intrepid argument instead of resorting to ad hominems about "more educated flat earthers than I".
explain the horizon? i'd ask the same of you. way doesn't it fall away ?
but i can see this is a pointless conversation, so i won't bother.
flat earthers are more educated, i don't know how you could remain a ball earther since the entirity of the argument is NASA and other government agencies that require your faith that they aren't lying to you.
That's your explanation? You mean you can't explain why the sun and moon, constellations, raise and fall behind the horizon?
BTW, NASA is not the world's authority on the shape of the world. And your conspiracy requires every single nation and professional in the world that deals with space to conspire without one whistle blower. The shape of the world is not a matter of "faith". It has been observed for thousands of years and measured to fairly high accuracy by people in different times. Galileo was decapitated for saying it's not flat and at the center of the universe. The fact that you think the shape of the world is a matter of faith is hilarious. You think also that there's a conspiracy over the most redundant thing, the most inconsequential thing, which is why it's ridiculous squared. Your whole theory is "they lied before, why wouldn't they lie about everything".
Posted using Partiko Android
i said throw out all your NASA proofs. ... what do you have?
go out and find proofs that aren't government 'space programs'.
you'll find there is very little, if you look at all. but your 2000 proofs don't exist. and what does exist is flimsy.
you can only reproduce a rainbow with a mirror over the light source.
why does the horizon not fall away? because you are seeing as far as your perspective allows.
if we were on a ball, the horizon should fall away as we rise.
The sun, moon and constellations move below and raise above the horizon. People have recognized that the earth, like the moon, sun and other planets are spherical for thousands of years before NASA.
The other thing that you evaded two times so far is a motive to sustain a conspiracy spanning hundreds of years without one single person blowing the whistle. Why lie about something so banal, something so irrelevant to everyday people?
GPS. "space programs"? How many satellites do you think have been launched into space?
Posted using Partiko Android
all explained by perspective. you know, how things look smaller farther away they are...
yes the sun and moon appear spherical, so what?
i certainly don't feel we are moving at 1000mph (which ball theory says you are, but they don't talk about it..) or that if i put you on a merry-go-round and spun you that fast you fly off... and the closer you are to the edge the worst it gets.. and we are on the very edge of a giant spinning sphere? we get flung off..
and you are supposedly held down by gravity.. a force (whatever it is) so weak that you can jump to over come it... and it is keeping you attached to the planet... yeah, right.
oh, and why isn't the atmosphere in constant turmoil... how could it ever be calm.. spin a globe of fluid... would it ever be calm ?
if you notice the number of fake flat earth 'leaders' out number the real ones.. maybe you'd understand that a lot of effort went into hiding it.
list of disinfo agents known
yet the truth just won't go away.
make people fear. aliens, asteroids... and keep from looking beneath their feet were the real asswipes live... in caves.