Your version seems to me as if we are already at home in the machine language and such what the brain research publishes. And then again you mix it with a mysticism and a kind of desire for a deity that can create and destroy. ...

A feeling of inferiority before such a fast computer capacity, an omnipotence to which man feels helplessly at the mercy of.

Your story reflects the realization that all knowledge about living existence is anchored in each individual, although it cannot be captured comprehensively as data knowledge.

How should I understand your end? Is it a kind of transition of consciousness into a more powerful one that is not subject to the habits of physics? It seems to me that the main thread of your storyline is the will to grow and integrate the environment?

What convinces me is the question of the meaning that people like to ask - which your character also asks - and yet they claim to be atheists, expressing their longing for something higher elsewhere. Personally, I do not necessarily agree with this and actually believe that intelligence is an expression of the universe, even though such intelligence is unlikely to be man-orientated.