I love how the beginning and end blurb are just repeats of each other, wherewith the story repaints the "after-the-fact" inner monologue of the non-wife. The story itself is that pure moment where which all the history so far seems to have justified their union, seeing how much emotional energy they outburst here. To then only have it robbed in front of their eyes as it was not meant to be unfortunately. Taken by Fortuna herself, does the inner monologue not only changed but alludes to an ambiguity.

Now what do I mean ambiguity? I mean in the sense of double meaning if we just break the word down. This ambiguity of it just being a scene to then also being a morose scene is clearly present yet one over the other trying to affirm themselves. The outsider view from the beginning to the inner monologue of the end; to just say both are equally valid would betray their hearts and make them more angered. Truly it is better to say that both are pieces to a grand picture of which the story can only allude to. The Objective-Subjective World, of which only the non-wife truly knows: she being in the material World, yet equally it reminding her the horrid "Wedding memory" she will fight against and overcome as she will not let that unholy memory take control of her. As long as she has that Kirkegaardian faith in her.

{Also outstanding job yielding that @curie vote, got mines recently as well~ Anyways, good evening or day or morning or high noon or afternoon to yah, @seesladen.}