Thank you for being the voice of the curators, people think this is a simple task, and it is quite the opposite, sometimes you can last up to 2 hours looking for a publication to nominate, taking into account that each project has its rules (something that is very valid) and I think the guidelines are always important, because that highlights the fact that people must do a good job to deserve a good reward, that's what mutual effort and work is all about, the curator and the content creator.

I have always said since we are in this newsteem, the best advantage that the bid bots have is that they already have the power to vote, now they only need the human power, those are the curators, establish their rules of curation as with any project with their curators and see the rewards, I think that way more time is invested in doing what should be done and not in conflicts that is only damaging the platform itself.

I'm a content creator, and I've also been a curator for a year and a half. It bothers me as a content creator to see high posts ($50 or $60) of mistranslation or plagiarism abuse for sources from a very recognized community that do absolutely nothing, a translation that takes 1 minute, while I as a creator take 1 to 4 hours to make a story and translate it. So why not improve that? instead of creating personal conflicts that damage the work of many, the reward does matter, I must say, because just as an art content post has its well-earned value, an upvote of a compilation of authors says "these curators do an excellent job for the platform", the compilations are acknowledgements of the author and the curator, deserves respect.