You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: A Few Ideas For The @familyprotection Cause Initiated By @canadian-coconut and @markwhittam
curlfamilyvlog, saying ''you've researched the case'' tells me a lot about you. Giving you the benefit of the doubt it can only mean one thing, you don't know how to research. If you look into her case it's impossible to arrive at the conclusion you have. For you to understand this case it requires more hours than you could imagine. Everything is linked and you can only learn the truth if you look into every aspect of her case.
This is the link to the actual report that I am talking about. If I was not clear as this is the actual Medical Evaluation Report done on the child. https://www.scribd.com/document/196480488/Spurwink-Report-of-Mila-s-Sex-Abuse-Report-3
"Genital and rectal examination were performed in a supinesemi-recumbent position on mom's lap. Present in the room during the examination were Mila, her mother, my adrriinistrative assistant, and myself. On an anxiety scale of 0-5, Mila was minimally anxious with a level of 1. Labia majora and labia minora were normal. On labial separation, the hymen did not dilate; on labial traction, the hymen dilated transversely to 3 mm. Hymen was U shaped, with no breaks or scars. There was no evidence of vaginal discharge or vaginal bleeding. SUlcus was normal. Urethra was normal. Posterior fourchette and fossana vicularis were normal. Anal-rectalarea had normal appearance. Perineum was normal. There was normal rectal sphincter tone"
On the following page he states that there is no evidence that shows any recent trauma.