Click to watch 2 hours (or just check out the first 10 minutes),

I disagree that "sensemaking can't be simplified" (the three rules of civil debate are quite simple) and I disagree that debates are always better "face to face" (and or always counter-productive (you just need better rules)), I also disagree with his attempt to contrast "truth" and "truthfulness". I think what he calls "truthfulness" is better described as "sincerity" (and of course, sincerity does not equal truth).

It also reminds me of "truthiness" which describes a statement that "feels true" and is thus accepted as true without proper examination.

They also neglected to point out the very important danger of inadvertently forming a "cult of personality". By revealing their face and name, I believe there is a strong human tendency to "trust" a person (instead of one specific idea at a time) uncritically (100%) after an initial skepticism.

I also liked their theme of "coherence", I'm a huge fan of this.

HOwever, every time I hear someone say "objective" or "unbiased" my logiczombie sense throws a huge red flag.