Ok, thanks for clearing that up.

Certainly there are works of famous people ("great minds") that are beacons of reason.

But you don't sound like the kind of person who would believe EVERYTHING that Einstein or Tesla or Nietzsche or Schauberger or Hyek may have said, "just-because-they-said-it".

Their "wisdom" is worth considering because of its logical-coherence, NOT simply because a particular person said it.

Voluntarism is a nice-sounding hypothesis, but without a reliable enforcement mechanism or referee, I'm not sure how scalable it might be in practice.