You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The USE-CASE for GOVERNMENT - (GARF)

in #ethics5 years ago

Not only that, but the tech cartels (technocracy), corporatism, monopolies, etc, are also becoming referees, AKA governmental. For example, Google, Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Twitter, Microsoft, etc, are doing things that referees would only dream of doing in a variety of ways.

In my Government As Referee Framework (GARF), any corporation (like the goog or fakebook) would be considered a sports team.

Sort:  

The government and the nation might then be the building where the sports are played inside.

Good thinking.

I think the building should be designed by the referees.

The building would be the public roads, water and sewer, and electric grid.

You can't really have a match between corporations without public roads, water and sewer, and electric grid.

I just had a great idea for a new MMORPG!!

The problem might be if there is a posted sign that says everybody can play sports and compete against each other in the building, that is if the referees then say that there are excessive amounts of exception clauses to that posted sign that are way too excessively unwritten and invisible.

I agree, the rules should be (coherently) based on, and logically reducible to simple, basic, primary AXIOMS.

As opposed to selectively enforced. Epstein didn't kill himself.

I also agree that rules should be uniformly enforced.

Judicial discretion and "gut-instinct" should have absolutely no place in law enforcement.

Good luck trying to separate the two.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.17
TRX 0.13
JST 0.027
BTC 60497.39
ETH 2637.52
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.56