You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: The USE-CASE for GOVERNMENT - (GARF)
We, 'mericans expect a level playing field
That's what we are told, and what we expect,
and we never find out how tilted the field is until we have a run in with the rich or govern-cement.
Like why did Catherine Austin Fitts have to spend millions of dollars to defend herself from nothing? The only thing the prosecution had was what they tried to make up (SOP)
Our monetary system, for instance is a field that is tilted about 30° with the bankster goal being the entire down-slope side of the field, and the little peoples goal is this tiny thing at the top. So, if a player ever loses the ball, the banksters score a point.
Why do any innocent people have to spend any time or money defending themselves?
I believe public defenders must be granted EQUAL FUNDING and EQUAL RESOURCES to match prosecutors in order to be perfectly fair and a PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE must be paramount.
Well, unfortunately the exact opposite is true.
SOP (standard operating procedures) is to plant evidence, destroy evidence and then claim the defendant did it, get a 3rd party to entrap, coaching law enforcement to lie...
Good point. The field itself is also highly problematic.