You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: What could a blockchain Constitution look like?
Well, I do read agreements, generally, before I accede to them. You never sold me a car.
I think that the agreements we make are ALL government, and that creating such a Constitution as this has the potential to make agreements far less unpalatable. Government, in actuality, is nothing more than an agreement. It is not a building. It is not money, or arms, or votes, although all these things can be used for government.
Thanks!
Maintaining property rights by ensuring reversibility by bad actors/honest mistakes, is your sticking point? How do you solve issues without an agreement? I fail to see how you can accomplish what he is attempting without doing what he is doing. I believe he is as fluid and precise as he can be with his movements. Utopia will not be built by stifling the voices of the wronged.
Hi @tom74. I fail to see that this reply to my comment references my comment. Perhaps it was meant for a different comment?