Principled Blockchain Governance Requirement #7 - Community exercises their Democratic voice to set rules

2 months ago
56 in eos

BUT! We’re still not there because any two poles governance system as described in Principles #6 and before eventually collapses.

That’s because the poles eventually form a pattern where they are equal in some ways and entirely mirrored in other senses, and when they’ve evolved into the Republocrats and the Demipublans, they enter what is known as deadly embrace. And stasis ensues. In other words, the community gets locked in terminal war and dies a long slow torturous death.

The solution to this is a third chamber of governance, which creates a three-legged stool effect - strong and stable enough to support a community, but not high enough to lock the community up. And the goto answer here is to have literally that - a chamber of community governance over the various rules and processes. In that chamber, the community can vote on referenda of importance: who can be a Producer, who can be an Arbitrator, what a new rule can be, who gets beheaded, whatever your fancy.

Requirement #7 - Community exercises their Democratic voice to set rules

We know how to do this - it’s the voting thing from Steem/Bitshares. Basically, you and all of you mates can vote on any issue of importance, and this includes things like changes to the rules and upgrades to the software.

Panama ballot

Now we’ve got a stable arrangement like legislature, judiciary, executive. Or, Oceania, Eurasia and Eastasia, if you like your literature. Now we’ve got a governance mesa on which we can trade, build, interact. Safely and securely, to the limits of the system.

If you like that, let’s do it. Watch out for future developments that employ a Principled Approach to Blockchain Governance. You know you want to...

See also @dantheman's How to create a meaningful Blockchain Constitution and earlier post Why every Blockchain needs a Constitution.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
Join our amazing community to comment and reward others.
Sort Order:  trending
26
  ·  last month

Blockchain governace: Stigmergy Age

One example of autonomy systems with its own laws and rules is the global bitcoin ecosystem based on blockchain. [1] Blockchain technologies are transferring our finance and legal systems by cryptocurrency payment and smart contract systems. [2][3][4][5] They are offering a stigmergy approach, enabling systematic cooperation in an entirely distributed and decentralized manner.[6][7][8][9][better source needed] They can be considered as hyper-political and global governance tools, capable of managing social interactions on a large scale and dismissing traditional central authorities.[10] The blockchain may allow human beings to evolve to a Stigmergy Age with leaders without orders, order without law,[11][12] gift without tax[13] and communities without borders[14].[15][16][17]

Jump up ^ Ben van Lier (April 25, 2017). "Blockchain and the Autonomy of Systems". Centric.eu.
Jump up ^ Ito, Joichi (March 8, 2017). "The Blockchain Will Do to the Financial System What the Internet Did to Media". Harvard Business Review.
Jump up ^ Don Tapscott (May 8, 2016). "Here's Why Blockchains Will Change the World". Fortune.
Jump up ^ Bodhani, Aasha (May 29, 2016). "Blockchain: the new world order". ITP.net.
Jump up ^ DECENTRALIZED BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY AND THE RISE OF LEX CRYPTOGRAPHIA, SSRN, accessed March 21, 2017.
Jump up ^ Field, Matan (October 26, 2015). "Stigmergic Economy And Large-Scale, Decentralized Networks". Network society.
Jump up ^ Bauwens, Michel (November 6, 2015). "Primavera De Filippi on stigmergy, swarming, collective intelligence and the evolution of cooperation". P2P Foundation.
Jump up ^ Allen, Darcy W.E. (January 22, 2017). "Discovering and developing the blockchain crypto economy". SSRN.
Jump up ^ Rifkin, Jeremy Jeremy Rifkin (November 14, 2016). "THE 3RD INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION STRATEGY STUDY" (PDF). Meteorological Station of the Lycée Classique de Diekirch (Luxembourg).
Jump up ^ Atzori, Marcella (January 2, 2016). "Blockchain Technology and Decentralized Governance: Is the State Still Necessary?". SSRN. SSRN 2709713 Freely accessible.
Jump up ^ McGinnis, John (7 March 2017). "Bitcoin: Order without Law in the Digital Age". SSRN. SSRN 2929133 Freely accessible.
Jump up ^ Kostakis, Vasilis (May 3, 2017). "Can blockchain, a swiftly evolving technology, be controlled?". The Conversation.
Jump up ^ Oberhauser, Alex. "Decentralized Public Ledger as Enabler for the Gift Economy at Scale". Academia.edu.
Jump up ^ Chadha, Rajneesh (May 12, 2017). "Blockchain – Marching Towards Creation of 'No Boundary' Economies". Entrepreneur India.
Jump up ^ ATTFIELD, PAUL (June 6, 2016). "THE FUTURE OF MONEY: No banks, no borders. Bitcoin is not the only cybercurrency". The Globe and Mail.
Jump up ^ Reijers, Wessel (November 6, 2016). "Governance in Blockchain Technologies & Social Contract Theories". Ledger (journal).
Jump up ^ Srinivasan, Prianka (April 20, 2017). "The GovLab Selected Readings on Blockchain Technology and Its Potential for Transforming Governance". The GovLab.