BP offering to fund Arbitrators is a clear conflict of interest

in #eos-gov6 years ago (edited)

current case was announced and cheered on even,


https://twitter.com/EOS_Van/status/1010680093880999936

I hope this is a warning for any other BP.

Using funds you receive from Stakeholders to fund a 3rd party that rules over you is a conflict of interest.

If you're unable to follow all shenanigans but want a watchdog in power proxy vote for 'elderberries'
How to Proxy vote

Edit: the ECAF formally refused this offer eventually

Sort:  

Why don't we design a system like jury duty. Choose a number of members at random, or in a shuffled random to not repeat and then out of that number, the first 8 or 10 members to accept the duty (voluntarily) can become the arbitration team fvor whatever dispute is in question. This puts the power directly into the peoples hands.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.17
TRX 0.15
JST 0.029
BTC 61986.52
ETH 2406.81
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.65