You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Wondering If The Poisoned Russian 'Spy' In UK Was Really Hit By Russia? Test My Open Source Process For Reliably Discovering Truth. Works On All Claims Made By Gov/Science/Religion/Teachers + All Other Forms of Assumed 'Authority'.
So the fact that the evidence is being presented by a government group with a proven track record of faking evidence to start wars is irrelevant to you? The fact that the recipe for the toxin is public domain and must have been in the hands of the british scientists for them to idenitify it and yet they claim only Russia has the recipe is totally logical to you?
The same can be said about the Russians + they probably had more incentive to get rid of him.
I imagine that Russia has been involved in treacherous faking of evidence, just as Britain and America has been, yes. However, the point here is that the people claiming that they 'know' that russia was behind the attack have a track record of literally starting wars based on lies that they have deliberately created to make other nations look bad. They have specifically not followed correct protocol and so it's like a bad dream stuck on repeat.. They lie, people blindly trust them, wars happen.. Rinse and Repeat.
Yes, it is clearly possible for the Russian mafia government to be behind the attempted murder - but to blindly state that we KNOW this was the case, given the circumstances, is foolish.
Those in the west who orgasm at the thought of millions dying in wars they start (and get paid for as a result of the involvement of major weapons companies) have plenty of motive to cause such events and pin the blame on others.