You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The First Domestic Earthship in the UK receives an official NEGATIVE Carbon Footprint! Mind Blown

in #ecotrain6 years ago

I really hate the term carbon footprint. CO2 is not a pollutant, nor has any affect on global temperature. So, although it is a good metric, as it is a straight conversion of how much fuel (oil, coal...) that was burnt to let you live, "carbon footprint" places the focus on the wrong things.

Earthships are a far better living environment. And, in the future, match box houses will be abandoned for the comfort of earthships.

Sort:  

MMM. thanks for your comment. I feel like you are a bit too sure of yourself here, considering 99% of scientists worldwide have correlated CO2 to global warming very clearly.. No need to debate this! just sayin'

and yes, totally agree the living environment, and reduction of stress through self sufficiency is priceless!

99% of scientists worldwide have correlated CO2 to global warming very clearly..

Oh, but there is a need to debate this, because its all lies.

You remember that movie, starring Al Gore, an Inconvenient lie?
In there, he says, "Don't they look like they go together?"
And everyone in the audience should have shouted, "Lets put them together and find out".

So, either Al Gore is lying or he is not a scientist.
Because any scientist would have put them together. Lotus 123 was created over 40 years ago. Its easy.

Except that, what they show is that CO2 has no effect on temperature.
The temperature graph leads the CO2 graph.
Temp goes up, then later, CO2 goes up. Temp goes down, then later CO2 goes down.

So, unless CO2 is causing temperature changes by going back in time, then CO2 has nothing to do with temperature.

Now, lets add another graph to that plot. Sun spot activity. And low and behold, it matches the other graphs, except that it leads temperature, which leads CO2.

The 99% of scientists is a lie too. You can look up that one.

im sorry but i do get a bit frustrated with people who really are not scientists debunking the science.. mainly due to conspiracy theory or lack of trust in the system. I am not naive enough to believe what im told by the system without some due diligence.. but im also not going to jump on the sceptics bandwagon ..

most people who say this is all lies, and just for tax and other purposes i think are kidding themselves.. They are VERY paranoid about governments (rightly so) but extend this to GLobal warming.. TO say 99% of science is a lie on this is really a bit far fetched! Sure sun spots effect things, but that doesn't mean it is the only effector. The vast majority of scientist have dedicated incredible time and effort to report the truth, so we better listen properly without just repeating conspiracy theories!

maybe read these !
https://skepticalscience.com/evidence-for-global-warming.htm
https://www.skepticalscience.com/empirical-evidence-for-global-warming.htm

here is a half decent video too.. I HOPE you do your due diligence and dont just believe some website just because it sounds true

Of course I am not a scientist.
My ideas were too radical to be allowed through college.
I write as often as I can about how our science books are complete and utter bollox.

When they included UN interns in the # of scientists...
... and you complain about not arguing against scientists.

Right now, we are entering into an ice age. (grand solar minimum)
As such is happening, earth ships will be even more highly prized.


Now, I would love to talk about pollutions. And the global elite who are pushing world wide pollution. And how to minimize these pollutants. Further I would love to talk about community sized zero and low emission power plants that we can build right now. But, I do not consider CO2 a pollutant.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.18
TRX 0.13
JST 0.028
BTC 57605.72
ETH 3101.08
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.33