Firstly, Suhas had absolutely no reason to waste time showing something that he knew to be a waste of time. Also, when someone says they are open to being evaluated without restriction and to make the technology open - one has to pay attention.

Suhas is 74, mature people of his engineering calibre and lucidity of mind tend not to lie about what they are doing. Also, he asked and asks for no money.

What was interesting that after accepting the notion of the importance of producing heavy Electrons (such as muons) and coupling to the structure of the physical vacuum (tetrahedral with octahedral interstitial spaces), this naturally leads to thinking what would be the paths of least resistance to achieve this.

1. Tetra-hedral structures (like Titanium Hydride, Stibine or [AlH4] )
2. Elements with low ionisation energy (Xenon or Potassium)
3. Metals with high conductivity (Aluminium, Gold, Copper, Silver)
4. Metals with favourable oxidation / shell configurations (Titanium, Chromium, Iron, Nickel)

You start to see the elements that are chosen in claimed high COP New Fire embodiments just as a matter of course.

Combine this with Stoyan Sarg's "Heterodyne resonant mechanism" approach to getting an atoms electron into a state that can interact with the 10^20 structure of the physical vacuum. Essentially, put it into the Rydberg state and electromagnetically stress it in this state.

This leads you to want glow discharges (to not fully ionise your easy to ionise elements and hence have more atom species in the Rydberg state) and then 'charge them up'.

A leap was to say that if heavy electrons (like muons) can replace electrons in Deuterium - why can they not in any element? The evidence is that they can in fact - and this comes from John Hutchinson. Moreover, Clean Planet patent
relies on production on non-specified energy 'heavy electrons'.

Non-detailed evidence from Kenneth Shoulders and even within videos of John Hutchinson show that heavy electrons (or EVOs in KS parlance) are readily stored in Metals. Since metals can conduct electrons, why not Heavy electrons? The on and off cycles of Rossi's E-Cat is explained by needing to build up EVOs.

Transmutation, direct electricity, light, intense magnetism, strange radiation, anti-gravity, muon releases, propulsion, radiation shielding and more are all explained by EVOs.

We had discussed fluidising fuel with phonons years ago - however we never had the expertise. Suhas did and used it.

Our normal experiments rely on thermal production of EVOs and are limited to metal stress relief cracking or structure discharges to produces low level EVOs.