You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: ECCO - An instant on/off ultrasonically fluidised dusty plasma New Fire reactor
Thankyou for the generosity of all those that have donated.
We have already received $26,425 in donations.
The estimated costs of the tests at this stage are $8000 for ECCO and $4000 for me356 (name of reactor TBA). Buy doing them back to back we may be able to make some significant logistical savings.
Suhas is aiming to come back with the cost of making a backup ECCO reactor Wednesday.
So what do you think are the key differences between this experiment and the others that were run with MFMP.
In those there was no verified COP greater than 1.5 and this claims a COP of 8, why do you think this works?
I appreciate all the hard work.