thanks i guess

writers write about what puzzles them, i am puzzled when others are not puzzled by the same things, or don't want to be informed about things that affect them. what i would prefer to money is someone to actually prove i'm wrong at one of my points of logic, because this stuff is disturbing to me and it is a lot to bear to know it.

i especially am curious why when i say a bold claim, like 'i have proven that there is systemic legalized child abuse in the united states, there are people so powerful that they can steal children to abuse and they are getting away with it as we speak'

people go ho hum. like it couldn't happen here or something, or they are too busy to be concerned. i just don't get it. the evidence is overwhelming. well you can lead a horse to water....everyone has to make their own moral choices. it's not like i didn't know most usa folk were sleepwalking.