Sort:  

That sentence doesn't really make sense but i think i understand what your trying to write. Major donors to PFAW include George Soros' Open Society Institute. Why would people from PFAW be all over CPAC and why would they have adverts about supporting Israel all over? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People_for_the_American_Way

People for the American Way
People For the American Way (PFAW) is a liberal advocacy group in the United States. Organized as a 501(c)(4) non-profit organization, PFAW was registered in 1981 by the television producer Norman Lear who founded the organization in 1980 to challenge the Christian right agenda of the Moral Majority.

I do not understand. You mean that a liberal organization is attending CPAC and that CPAC is funded by Soros? Do you have any harder evidence than Wikipedia?

There is more evidence below. Follow the links. Yes its a shame there alot of RINO's in the republican party and really they are standing in the way of a real right wing movement. Its the same in the UK. The "Conservative" Party recently explained that there will be a law in 2020 that children will have to learn about trannys and the difference between a tranny and a transvestite etc and other degeneracy at school aged 8 and it will be illegal for their parents to remove their children from classes. This along with other things surrounding "equality and diversity" would have made communists blush 30 years ago but now they are "conservative"

However, since 2004, People for the American Way’s 501(c)(3) associated entity has received $2.6 million from liberal billionaire George Soros‘ Open Society Institute (now the Open Society Foundations), according to data from the Foundation Center.[52]

https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/people-for-the-american-way/

Evans, Will. “McCain, GOP Senators Challenged On Pay Equity For Women.” NPR. September 30, 2008. Accessed January 17, 2017. https://www.npr.org/sections/secretmoney/2008/09/mccain_challenged_on_judges.html

Ok, I can understand from history as in the case of Bush Jr who was expanding the welfare state in order to win elections and that similar was done by other GOP members. And now with Trump GOP is promoting right-wing collectivism and protectionism which the Republicans have historically been against by promoting more limited government and freedom. So yes, I do see that republicans and conservatives in USA are doing more of statist, welfarist, collectivist policies. But what has that to do with Soros foundation?

Basically in my view, Soros and left wingers and globalists with lots of money are steering conservatism into a harmless free market party with no real policies or influence (they go along with modern liberalism and support Israel) and they are standing in the way of a real right wing movement.

I do not agree. First of all, there is no such evidence. Second, Republicans have always supported pro-Israel policies regardless who is in the Israeli government. Also, GOP, Republicans and many conservatives have since Trump being more orienting towards natavism and collectivism especially when it comes to discussions about immigration and identity. And what would we a "real" right-wing movement? A libertarian one? I would like to hear more about that.

Nationalists that are principled and defend the right of their own people to have a future and a heritage in their own countries. How well do you think "Libertarian-ism" will do in the coming decades as the left import more and more immigrants who have more and more children who vote overwhelmingly Democrat? Its too weak to do anything, its essential just riding the fence really hard.

"Defend" in which sense? What is the content of such "defence"? Nationalism is about absolute identity politics, identity monopoly, myths, hate, fear and reduction of freedom. Nationalism is little bit like being bigger Catholic than a Pope behaviour. Things as identity, culture, rights are based on our human rights and individual freedoms. Saying that nationalist defend such rights is simply untrue because such behaviors lead to corruption, wars and authoritarianism. Also, not even in the USA you have a single nation, there is a big difference between San Francisco and small tows in Rust Belt. I support open borders/global free movement on the basis of interactions between individuals. If you want USA to have less illegal immigration, well try making more immigration legal and let cities as Los Angeles to decide on refugees and asylum seekers.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.22
TRX 0.06
JST 0.025
BTC 19076.95
ETH 1325.71
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.54