Thanks for the link to the logic site. Love it.

There are some known Ham radio operators who attest to having picked up signals from Apollo (Paul Wilson, Richard Knadle, Larry Baysinger, Sven Grahn), but none of them can attest to having tracked these probes either to the moon or back. Neither do NASA.

Grahn for example only testifies to having picked up signals from Apollo 17 when it was in earth orbit. Baysinger only received communications from Apollo 11 during the alleged moonwalk. Wilson & Knadle received signals from a diversity of Apollo missions, but again only when the crafts were in alleged lunar orbit – an exception being Apollo 15 in which they received a handful of signals on the alleged flight home, though these were automated transmissions, no human voices were recorded.

However, as early as 1946 the U.S Navy had already set up Earth-Moon-Earth (EME) transmissions using the moon as a radio wave, reflecting satellite. Presumably this would have been an essential part of any attempted hoax. Of course Baysinger believed he was receiving transmission from the moon, as did everyone else (with a few notable exception.) Though logically this could also have been continuation of Operation Moon Bounce (or similar). So his evidence, though seemingly compelling, doesn't 'prove' anything and the alleged moonwalk remains highly questionable. I have highlighted some of the reasons I personally don't believe it.

I note that you haven't commented on NASA's released footage of the Apollo 11 astronauts faking images of a distant Earth, while clearly in low Earth orbit, on 18th - 20th July 1969 when Apollo 11 should have been between 140 - 200,000 miles from Earth. You will note the non existent transmission lag in their communications. There's no lag, because they were in low Earth orbit.

So, in regard to your claims about Baysinger's recordings, your logical fallacy for the day is False Cause.

You are confused, believing that correlation implies causation.