I used Google translate to read this post and, even with the usual loss of context through the translation, what is expressed in my opinion is certainly a very sound initial theoretical basis for the foundation of the voting system.
My only critique is that no amount of AI resources can usurp the value and efficiency of knowledgeable human evaluation and vetting of qualitative reasons for value judgments regarding content.

I would also suggest that much work needs to be done to build on the current content value proposition to widen the range of quality content subject matter and encourage truly explosive growth of creative, artistic, philosophical, and entertaining posts on the platform.

This is a discussion that I see generating very strong opinions and emotional outbursts which is needed in order for new and innovative ideas to appear to solve the many challenges ahead in realizing the true potential of the Steemit platform.