RE: Results from my research about healthy steem community
I think that you could have done better with this... you've jumped around a few different complaints without being entirely clear what each complaint is (although I think that the "make some noise "complaint was quite clear).
Going back to the complaint about the event organiser (at very least) favouring the people they know...
I also suggested looking at friends of friends / introducers. Then a pattern might emerge.
Wk 2: 3rd place - 'alisha-doll' who was introduced by friend 'hammad-historian' who was introduced by her sister 'nalainzahra' who was introduced by event organiser 'aaliarubab'.
Wk3: 3rd place - 'hammad-historian' (see Wk2).
Wk5: Additional mention - 'hudamalik20' introduced by organiser 'aaliarubab'.
Wk6: The 2 we've already discussed who were introduced by the event organiser.
5 winners in 6 weeks have a trail leading back to the event organiser. With each contest attracting over 150 entrants, what are the odds that approximately 20+% of the winners are connected to the person responsible for choosing the winners? Maybe the event organiser knows 20% of the entrants 🤷🏼♂️
You could also look at their use of booming. 3 out of the 4 recent nominations were either herself or somebody she introduced (or an introduction of an introduction). This is consistent across many of the booming posts with a minimum of 2 out of 4 nominations going to people she is linked to.
Maybe her community is dominated by people she knows 🤷🏼♂️
@adeljose shares a regular booming report - I've not looked at it for a while and I probably shouldn't find it amusing who is highlighted in red 😆
Then there's this (scroll down to shared wallets)... ("Wk 2: 3rd place - 'alisha-doll' who was introduced by friend 'hammad-historian' who was introduced by her sister 'nalainzahra' who was introduced by event organiser 'aaliarubab'.")
https://raptor.in.ua/clubstatus.php?author=nalainzahra
Recognise some of these names?
Which suggests that somebody's trying to hide their multiple transactions.
Which can be seen on the steem-exchange wallet:
https://steemitwallet.com/@steem-exchange/transfers
Where these multiple accounts are transferring to a Binance wallet of 100651587.
And now you have something.
A load of accounts that are getting plenty of booming support and winning prizes in Healthy Steem. All hiding their transactions which all end up in the Admin's wallet.
Wow you did so well friend, with your advice and tracking I would still look deeper and make my explanation deeper. Although I had already generated suspicion on both 'aaliarubab' and 'hammad-historian' transaction memo using a tool for the tracking transaction memo and transaction history. I discovered the both of them were trying to hide their memo and instead of using the famous numerical memo they used a different one 'For cash' or 'transfer for cash'.
But I didn't add it to my post because I wanted to take more time to analyze them efficiently and effectively. Expect a more explain fact soon friend
EDIT: And now that we know 'dexsyluz' selected the winners for Wk1, the winner percentage is probably nearer to 30%.
Hello boss, please I would love to discourse something important with you. I would love to assisting you in any little way, in the redesigning of steemit website
I am a web developer with skills in HTML CSS, JavaScript mysql MongoDB, node js.