You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: An Analysis of 50% Curation Rewards in EIP and HF21 - All Delegators Should Read This
It was important to focus on vote trading as it was one of EIP's main claims: that human-curation would become more profitable than vote-trading. I've shown that's not true. I didn't even go into algorithmic-curation-mining ;-)
might be worth bringing your results to the attention of the witnesses especially the top 20. There hasn't been any indication they have actually looked at the mathematical outcomes.
Agreed, you possibly know more of them than I do. I dislike tagging but with so many other things going on might be worth doing. What do you think?
Just having a look to see who I've had contact with....
give it a go... the worst they will do is ignore the tag.
Would be good to get the opinions of some that will be directly affected, such a @therealwolf and @yabapmatt.
@ocd-witness and @curie should both be happy with these changes in curation rewards but not sure about their views on the whole package.
There were only 2 top witnesses who are against EIP - can't recall the 2nd person; will need to look it up.
@drakos was the second one .. he's #21 though
Well @rycharde. You should!! You actually should go balls-deep into the 'algorithmic-curation-mining' dark abyss to know better the kind of specimens living in the abyssal fauna throughout this ocean. There are some that even have their own light you know? And most of them are convinced that we must also follow blindly the 'light' they emanate.
However, I still have a small flashlight handy to light my way thru in my very own cranky style. };)
Cheers!!
Thanks, but it isn't even in the dark; 50% curation plus the crushing of small votes plus the new 1 minute reverse auction - all shine a bright light on what is going to happen.
Even when people watch the corporate news, they still don't understand what they are really being told.