Decenternet's White Paper & CEO: Is The Internet For Cyborgs or Humans?

In this, the fourth of my posts on the blockchain project called 'Decenternet', I intend to take you deep into a cybernetic rabbit hole where the rabbits may or may not use nano-sized robots to defend themselves against myxomatosis! My previous posts on Decenternet are required reading to understand this topic, so I suggest reading my introduction to Decenternet, my overview of the many propose D-Apps for Decenternet, my SWOT analysis of Decenternet and also the white paper for Decenternet.

Follow the white rabbit?

This post is going to go in a number of directions that all tie in to my own research and work into healing, balancing and evolving consciousness on Earth towards a real and felt balance. I have made a few posts in the past that cover the agenda to have the self proclaimed 'elite' of the planet turn into cyborgs as they attempt to overcome death and the human condition - this is not a plot from a sci-fi novel, this is the stated objective of people like Google's (ex) chief technologist Ray Kurzweil and many others who see themselves as among the planet's smartest people and think that there is no other solution for humans than to merge with machines.

One of the (many) mistakes they are making is one that I see many intellectuals making, which is that they have fallen into the belief system that says that if they keep up with published science then not only do 'they' know as much or more than everyone else about just about everything, but that they can also speak for every human as an authority as a result. You can see evidence of this kind of thinking when people write sentences that start with phrases such as 'We know this' or 'We don't know' - referring to all of humanity as if they can speak for all of humanity. One of the problems with this is that there is a vast amount of information and understanding that does not make it into scientific journals and even that cannot be measured by the systems created through the dogma of scientific materialism. Let's look at this specific issue before proceeding:

Scientific Materialism vs. Experiential & Non-Physical Awareness

---

A thread has run through human history that has effected nearly everything in society and yet which is rarely spoken about - it is the conflict between those who are convinced that "if it can't be measured then it isn't real" and those who know that it is entirely possible that some things simply cannot be measured and also that our own limited ability to measure things must not be used to influence perception of what is real and what is not. 'Dark Journalist' on Youtube has put together an epic series of videos spanning decades of research into this and related topics - so if you want a history lesson of how the so called 'mystery schools' of our planet have been in a battle with the 'scientific materialists' for a long time, I suggest starting there. If you are wondering how this all fits in with Decenternet, read on.

While there is much to be learned by measuring things using machines and devices - there is far more to be learned by correctly utilising our own instrument of the mind and other internal senses. Those who reject our own inner abilities in favour of machines are denying more than their limited imagination will ever realise. The journey of understanding life is also the journey of understanding self and so to deny the validity of inner awareness when discerning and discovering truth is to deny both self and our own potential.

The belief that humans must merge with machines is very much associated with scientific materialism, which denies our own roots as living beings and the spiritual essence of who we are - in favour of externalising our essence into manufactured machines (which have no felt connection to the roots of the cosmos).

Organic Natural Human Life vs. A Cyborg Future

---

By defining that there is no better option for humans than what (flawed) scientific materialism produces, those who support it and who deny other approaches are destined to lead themselves and whoever follows into a dead end - literally a dead end, where death is the only outcome. While it is true that many other paths also lead humans to death, this does not mean that there is no possible way to end death that does not involve becoming a cyborg! I have written many posts that touch on this and talk about the nature of life and death - however, it is a vast subject that requires potentially hundreds of pages to do justice to and is beyond the scope of this post. In short, by externalising our power into machined objects that have no heart or emotional body, we disconnect from our own ability to feel reality and to find the power we need to solve our problems. Placing ourselves into machines (or them into us) may seem desirable to linear mental processes within us, but it FEELS terrible to anyone that can still feel (deeply). This is because it is our emotional body that must be healed in order for us to evolve and move beyond death - so by rejecting our emotions even further by choosing a cyborg destiny, we are jumping to a false conclusion and to our own emotional and thus spiritual and physical death.

The only workable solution is one that focuses on personal empowerment and that does not rely on computers at all. I enjoy using computers and use them a lot - however, I never lose touch with the reality of the natural world and my own natural essence as part of my use of the technology and this is the key requirement for us to keep a balance while using technology.

Decenternet: Total Blockchain Integration into Life?

---

The Decenternet vision is all about human empowerment, but it also comes with promotion of an increased integration of technology into our lives - which follows a kind of centralised topology & network structure (whereby pretty much everything gets run via Decenternet without significant competition). While decentralisation of the internet in an effective way truly IS a step towards liberation when compared to the totally centralised internet that we have today, at the same time there is another risk whereby we become increasingly reliant on technology and lose touch with our own sentience, inner wisdom and personal power.

Linking together millions of people can be a good thing in many ways, but not if it limits free will or renders aspects of self to be 'obsolete' in favour of a hive mind mentality and reliance on others.

The Reality of Mind Control and Malicious Intent to Enslave Humanity

---

I am sure that the authors of the Decenternet whitepaper are quite aware of some of how mind control has been used to limit humanity, although the phrase 'mind control' does not appear in their white paper according to my text search of it - they do, however, describe modern schools as:

"totalitarian educational camps of indoctrination".

It is clear that their surface intention is to sell in ideal of liberation that ends mind control, however, there is an interesting and slightly disturbing factor involved here - there is a great deal of language in their white paper that itself can be called 'mind control'!

To fully appreciate why I am saying this will require some research into the mechanisms of mind control that are being used all around us in schools, in advertising and just about everywhere that those who intend to control us can influence. Mind control can be as gross and obvious as strapping someone to a dentist chair and forcing them to watch weeks of video material while injecting them with psychoactive drugs - or it can be extremely subtle and intended to work on the sub-conscious and even unconscious levels of people, without most of us ever noticing. Neuro Linguistic Programming (NLP) is one such technique that can be used to do this and while it is used by therapists to attempt to change behavioural patterns in people voluntarily, it can also be used when framing and creating text to sell people ideas such that people are swayed without them even knowing why. For example, if I say to you "Decenternet is a pragmatic solution for the decentralization of the Internet", there would be no covert agenda involved, it would simply be a statement of my understanding or opinion - however, in the Decenternet white paper, this is actually phrased as a leading question in the form: "When did you notice that the Decenternet was a pragmatic solution for the decentralization of the internet as we know it?". This kind of 'framing' of the idea is meant to leave your mind no logical space to manoeuvre and feels to me to be a kind of 'forcing' of ideas that does not respect the will and feelings of the reader who might disagree.

This 'forcing' of thought onto the reader is found in many places in the document and it does not feel like it is an honest presentation of information as a result. Why do ideas need to be forced onto anyone if they are good? They do not. The curious thing here is that the main selling point of the project is to actually stop this kind of forcing of ideas and control onto humanity, so it is strange indeed to encounter the same patterns in the document's own words.

Extra Terrestrial Takeover?

---

I generally try to stay away from this topic because it often invites ridicule and actual solid proof of it is very difficult to come by, however, I know that a significant number of people focus on this topic and have much to say on it. Whether they speak about 'The Annunaki', a group mentioned in Earth's ancient history who it is claimed still run governments covertly today - or whether it is shapeshifting reptilians or some other group - a significant number of people believe such a takeover to either be in progress or to have already occurred a long time ago.

As I have stated in my previous posts about Decenternet, there is a strong similarity between the language used in the whitepaper and the language of certain alleged ET groups. One such, easily accessible, source of information from these alleged groups is the channelled consciousness called 'Bashar'. You can view information about Bashar on the Bashar website. A high percentage of the 'positive' framing that takes place in the whitepaper and also ideas about multidimensional physics that are expressed in the whitepaper are similar or the same as that which is expressed via Bashar. Bashar claim to be a group of multidimensionally aware 'extra terrestrials' who live on a particular home planet and who are a hybrid of human genetics and genetics taken from a group of 'grey' ETs who destroyed themselves in our own future (oh yes, they can time travel). While this may sounds like nonsense and fantasy on the surface, if you listen to enough of their channelling sessions, you will quickly learn that their messages cannot be dismissed so easily and that the nature of their understandings regarding reality are highly unusual compared to that which are typically held by humans at this time.

My point here is that researchers of this topic typically point to groups of malicious entities and groups of benevolent entities - some of whom intend humanity's enslavement and some of whom intend us to become self empowered. The problem comes in understanding who is who and identifying where the malevolent ones are possibly just mimicking the benevolent ones to attempt to deceive us (assuming that these really are ETs and not just clever humans pretending to be ETs).

The Decenternet documents often speak about us (humans) as if the origin of the message is NOT human and even states that:

Realize that we have a much more sophisticated belief system now as the second most dominant species on this planet.

Which infers that humans are behind some other species on the planet in terms of dominance - which is never explained and the species is never named! So who exactly is speaking in the document and who are they referring to here?

Spirit channelling is very real and I have seen it done hundreds of times - however, it is definitely not always clear as to who is speaking through the channel and what their intent is. Another well known example of a channeled consciousness is 'Abraham' who has been heard by millions of people through numerous books, videos and presentations over recent years. Since the Decenternet white paper starts with the phrase: "Channeled by Sean Kim" - this is not something to ignore or laugh off!

Code Words, Symbolism & Questionable Intentions

---

One of the common topics that arises in the field of researching 'out there' subjects such as ETs and Secret Society / Cult control of life on Earth is that of symbology and Codes. This is not because the investigators are seeking to inject mystery and excitement into the topic, but because these subjects tend to involve study of ancient history to some extent and also of groups who want to be secret and hidden. Our ancient history contains many examples of symbolism being used on a large scale (just look at the hieroglyphs of ancient Egypt as one example of many) and the various world religions also use symbology by default too. This has opened up a vast world of code breaking and pattern matching techniques that researchers use to decipher events and from which they produce explanations that they claim reveal deeper secrets and truths than can be found otherwise.

In my own experience, I have seen some of the results of such exploration to be nonsense, but also seen a great deal of it to be valuable in numerous ways too. The difference between such analysis being of value and being valueless often comes down to the degree of bias, denial and balance involved in its creation and interpretation.

I mention all of this because I happen to know that those who have done a lot of research into covert programs allegedly operated by US military/government programs (and by other groups) often use very specific forms of coded language that relate to ancient mythology and specifically Ancient Egyptian terms. This appears to be due to a connection to ancient the Atlantean culture which Ancient Egypt is claimed to have emerged out of thousands of years ago. It has been exposed through numerous sources that the secret societies who wield the most power covertly via governments, often have a mission to recreate Atlantis and to attempt to produce the 'high' technology that they had back then. I appreciate that many people will not accept that Atlantis even existed - but that is not relevant here, since what is relevant is whether or not those who operate in the shadows to influence society think that Atlantis was real. Some of the forms of project names used in Decenternet are exactly the same project names as are found in black projects run to initiate mind control and various nefarious agendas. This is not speculation and at least one of the most evil projects to have arisen as a result of Nazi scientists having been relocated to America after WW2 (See: Operation Paperclip) was that of MK Ultra which was/is a TRAUMA based mind control project intended to convert humans into total slaves. MK Ultra was quietly admitted to by the US government a few years ago and their apology is recorded in the congressional record.

The 'Osiris' browser shares a name with projects used in mind control projects over the last few decades and the Liberty search engine shares it's name with the 'statue of liberty' which was created by Freemasons (who were also involved with the design of the layout of Washington DC and also the USA in general). Given that these connections are so obvious to anyone who has researched these subjects and given that many of the potential users of Decenternet will be exactly that demographic of people - it is curious to me as to why they would choose to blur the boundary between their project and the various mind control projects that millions of web pages have already been written about by many researchers.

The symbol used for Decenternet is called the Merkaba (Vehicle of Light) and is ancient symbol of manifestation and balance. It is commonly taught in Earth's mystery schools that the top tetrahedron and bottom tetrahedron that unite to create the star tetrahedron (3D shape seen in the Decenternet logo) represent the masculine and feminine energy of self and the cosmos (in balance). So there is clearly a direct connection between the ethos of Decenternet and the sacred geometric teachings from mystery schools that goes all the way back to before Ancient Egypt. The maths demonstrated by the Merkaba can be found in the great Pyramid in Egypt and the flower of life (which is closely related to the merkaba geometry) can be found in ancient temples all around the planet. The merkaba is not a 'bad' symbol in any way, I am just pointing out that there clearly is a connection between the logic being used by the Decenternet team and the activity of the mystery school religions and groups that have been involved in creating pyramid systems for thousands of years.

The 'Anuvys' Operating system sounds very much like 'Anubis' and thus also 'Anu'. Anubis is described as ‘a god who ushered souls into the afterlife‘ on Wikipedia. Anu is identified as the ‘father’ god of the Annunaki – who themselves a race/group/bloodline from Sumerian and ancient records. This group are often claimed to still operate on Earth, behind the scenes, altering events and politics for their own agenda. Given the heavy connotations of these words among those who study the crime syndicates and secret societies of Earth – I highly wonder what the logic was behind the choice of name here.

Anubis

There may well be a good explanation for this, but I have not seen it yet from any of the material I have seen for Decenternet online.

Here are a few other quotes from the documents that cause me some alarm:

The Decenternet effectively allows human creative energy to become a currency on its own. The only difference is that instead of being called human creative energy, it can also be called spyce.

So this appears to be conflating the living soul energy of humans with a cryptocurrency as if the two are equal when they are not.

The spyce expands human consciousness. The spyce advances civilization. The spyce empowers humanity.

This actually sounds like a line from a movie or cult brainwashing session. It is love, consciousness, felt intuition, wisdom balance and correct intent that expands human consciousness, advances civilisation and empowers humanity. Nothing will ever change that.

In this way, you, reading this, have a say in how much a human life is worth on this planet.

So there is a clear intent here to directly condition human consciousness to limit itself and its self perception to the confines of the operating system and technology being promoted here. This is not a minor point.

Tokenization of all aspects of human activity

Does this sound like liberation? Or like George Orwell's 1984 brought to life?

Establishment of a planetary scale constitution infused into all governance systems enforced by technology. For instance, all search engines on Decenternet are forever 100% open source.

How is a comment about creating a global government system run by technology explained by the idea of an open source search engine!? The two are hardly even related. Even setting this aside, do we really want to hand off personal responsibility for our decisions and logic to a computer system? Why do we think this is going in the right direction? I realise that handing off decision making to representational democracy is a terrible idea, but how about we don't hand it off at all?

The best thing of all is the guaranteed right to free life on this planet without violence or war.

Claiming that technology is all that is needed to ‘guarantee the right to life without war’ is extremely misleading. The roots of war and conflict can certainly be healed and transformed, but much more is needed to achieve this than technology. The white paper makes clear early on that to manifest decenternet, the reader (and other people) need to change their thinking to allow its manifestation (since outer manifestations are a reflection of inner reality) – yet this same logic is conveniently not applied when it comes to claims of world peace. Why would Decenternet require primarily a shift in thinking, but world peace requires technology/Decenternet and is not purely reliant on another change in thinking?

Personal Balance Is Needed Now

---

Ultimately, when we don't know the full truth and yet we are trying to navigate our way through complex information without knowing all the details - it is our own personal balance that will keep us safe. This is the message I have repeatedly spread through my work online for over a decade. So when it comes to this interesting challenge of understanding whether Decenternet is a blessing or a problem, I look to the evidence that I have to look for signs of spiritual balance and also imbalance.

Examining the CEO of Decenternet

---

I do not intend the following to be a personal attack or anything unpleasant against the authors of the Decenternet project, I am simply doing due dilligence analysis and research into the topic of their technology in order to both understand whether or not to support it and also to possibly highlight to them areas where they can improve and increase their own level of integrity and chances of success. The language presented by them is very much in favour of human evolution and increased balance/truth and the observations as I will make here are very much presented in the same progressive spirit as their own work is.

I found the following video of the CEO of Decenternet, Shaun Kim, talking about the project and have provided analysis of some of his quotes below:

naturally allow a transitional stage that they can gradually understand that an all inclusive economy that is run by a blockchain, a general consensus mechanism which is not subject to human greed or human emotions or human personal interests.

• Shaun Kim, CEO

Shaun repeatedly states that his aim is to use blockchain technology to remove (negative) emotions from the process of decision making that effects human life. This may appear noble on a certain level, since individual desires can override the needs of others when decisions can be made in a system that affect many individuals. Simultaneously, however, removal of felt input from the decision making process can also be a recipe for disaster and the mass over-riding of individual will.

Our current systems fail not because of the involvement of emotions but partially because of the judgements held against emotions (and judgements held against many other things/topics) that have us denying individual will and thus over-riding people in the process. It may be possible to program logic into a computer system that respects balance to a degree, but without space for support/respect of the fine atunement that emotions allow, we open the door to a continuation of a similar over riding of free will but in a new/different form where computers are the enforcers of the control and not a shadowy group of humans.

The animals, they don't complain to become your food

• Shaun Kim, CEO

Sadly, this is a comment that is in alignment with the kind of emotional disconnection and over-reliance on the mental self that is actually causing so many of our problems. The needed balance that emotions provide is missing here. Consider the terrifying realities documented in the documentary 'Earthlings' (below) and then compare it to the following video produced showing animals being released from incarceration - do you really have a sense and feeling that the animals in the first video would not complain?

Earthlings:

Animal liberation:

The artificial boundaries drawn between species is a common point of denial in humans who claim to be acting on spiritual principles - yet whose minds have not yet been decompartmentalised sufficiently to be truly honest and reliable. Claiming to be evolved and love based (thus loving animals), while having no problem with them being killed is neither logical, balanced nor honest/reliable. Equally, claiming that those with no voice can be treated in any way whatsoever simply because they have no voice, is frankly a sign of psychopathic pathology on some levels. The denial of the real feelings involved can be corrected by introspection and personal evolution - however, without a strong intent to heal, balance and evolve - plus having put in the years necessary to actually realise these intentions - it is likely that a variety of unintended consequences may arise as a result of unhealed parts of self making decisions and drawing conclusions that are thought to be progressive but which are actually destructive.

As a normal person you don't need to understand any of this.. Just like the community in South Korea, they just become excited by software that can make you money.

• Shaun Kim - CEO

This quote describes a disconnection from the details of the project, in favour of personal greed and is a direct contradiction to the ideals Shaun proclaims earlier in his talk and in his mission statements in general. On the one hand he is talking about a system that removes human greed from the equation as being a good thing - and on the other hand he is talking about human greed as being the motivating factor for support of the system. While this could possibly be seen as a clever way of helping to decondition/deprogram human greed from those who use the system - at the same time it is clear that the plan/agenda here is not doing much to enlighten those use adopt the system initially - rather it could be said to be simply drawing off unconscious humans away from our current corrupt system and moving them into a computer controlled replacement that lacks emotions and which may or may not result in greater liberty.

Is it fair to compare this to a removal of babies from mothers who may or may not be good mothers - in favour of them being raised in incubators, by robots? You might think this is a stretch of a comparison to be making, but the principle is actually validly applicable in both cases - the principle of removing human emotions and felt connection from the process of orchestrating life. Yes, we experience the trauma of living in realities where governments are being run by those without sufficient empathy and balanced emotional guidance - but that is not going to be improved by delegating to technology that has literally no emotional component.

Summation

---

I am not going to draw any final conclusion from these observations as to do so would require the Decenternet team to respond to my points. It may be that they can provide exciting and well thought out responses to these concerns and that I become a strong supporter of their work. I will be posting this and my other posts their telegram group and will update you with any responses I receive in my next post on this topic.

For More Information On Decenternet and Anuvys:

- Check out the Decenternet website
- Check out the ANUVYS website
- Follow the Decenternet Facebook page
- Follow Decenternet on Twitter
- Join Decenternet’s official group on Telegram

DISCLAMER: The information contained within this post shall not be taken as a financial advice. I am not a financial advisor and none of your investment decisions should be carried out based on any information presented here. You can lose all of your money by investing. The information presented in this article is for educational and entertainment purposes only.