David Seaman Buried at SEA! By the ZIONIST ILLUMINATI! For TEH LULZ!steemCreated with Sketch.

in #davidseaman8 years ago (edited)

David Seaman Buried at SEA! By the ZIONIST ILLUMINATI! For TEH LULZ!

I just can't believe it, the shocking evidence that David Seaman was buried at Sea by the Illuminati! It rhymes so it must be true! Of course the Zionists had to keep Seaman quiet about exposing their plans and the obvious connections to Trump! Seaman was such a "diehard" truther. I wish him well.

Watch my Video on This "Tragedy"

Also Available on Vid.Me: https://vid.me/YmX8

Also Available on BitChute: https://www.bitchute.com/video/KOE13F17bNk/

Obviously I am being sarcastic. Seaman is a Zionist bullshit artist and Trump deploraball licker. Here he got totally pwnd to death in this google live hangout by Jeff C, "New World Agenda": Video

Yeah add another bullshit gold / newsletter scam artist to my belt. @DollarVigilante you know what I am talking about. You and Seaman should become best friends over your common goal of making money off scams. At next when voting for the year's Steemit Player Hater's Ball, please remember this take down of Seaman, 'cause I am a shoo in for Hater of the Year 2017.

Here is a great video by "RedSilverJ" on the matter: Video

Here is the steemit article I wrote about it: https://steemit.com/davidseamanpwnd/@titusfrost/david-seaman-can-t-handle-criticism

Music Credit:

Intro Outro Music: "Mind Glitch" by Games Exposed & ODDTV: Link

Also "Who's Afraid" by Steve Grant: Link

YouTube Channels who also helped Take Down Seaman!

Help me out by up-voting and re-steeming this and or by making me an Independent Journalist by funding me on Patreon with monthly support. My Patreon

Don't forget to follow me @TitusFrost for more of my work coming in the near future...

You can also connect with me on:

Sort:  

David has some known (very public) issues from the past.

I get what you're doing, but I kind of feel like I'm watching someone needlessly berate someone else who's at a disadvantage.

I'm not defending DS, he's just not stable and that should be taken into consideration (perhaps) before spending a lot of time going after him.

"Hey look, I sure did shame that mentally unstable guy ... winning!"

Yeeeeaaah ... that's not winning. ;)

Mentally unstable? First I heard of that.

Not sure how that justifies the criticisms we had.

I am also done with Seaman, I got way bigger fish to fry.

Not sure how that justifies the criticisms we had.

The point I'm making (and you've helped make) is, (from an outside perspective) what does it say about your research credibility if you're spending your time going after a known mentally unstable person who spews nonsense to shill himself?

First I heard of that.

... especially when you haven't adequately researched the person you are supposedly "exposing"?

;)

He is not a well known "mentally unstable person" he presents himself as a journalist, and a public figure. I am criticizing his political opinions and the information he presents as a journalist. Stop playing this "victim" bullshit card for Seaman.

I researched him more than enough to be able to expose him as part of a 5/ 1/2 hour long show. During which my criticisms were 100% valid and you have not refuted any of them.

He is not a well known "mentally unstable person"

I disagree.

https://www.google.com/search?q=david+seaman+mentally+ill

Stop playing this "victim" bullshit card for Seaman.

Pointing out facts about someone ≠ defending them. By that logic you're defending PizzaGate.

It's unfortunate that you've chosen to take my constructive criticism this way, but it is very telling about your own confidence in your research. ;)

Unsolicited advice

  • Tone down the sensationalism (especially of people's images).
  • Relieve yourself of conjecture and assumptions.
  • Stick with the facts.
  • Research people more before wasting time "exposing" hacks that few with an IQ above 85 take seriously. You're only lowering yourself to their level and (believe it or not) giving them credibility (in the minds of some) and exposure.

Note : I didn't listen to your criticism of DS; the mere fact that you wasted your time on him was enough to solicit my response. ;)

Note : I didn't listen to your criticism of DS

Then why should I listen to anything you have to say?

Then why should I listen to anything you have to say?

For education, perhaps. ;)

Feel free to continue down the path of obscurity if you like; it's your credibility, not mine. Just trying to help, best of luck!

Pointing out facts about someone ≠ defending them. By that logic you're defending PizzaGate.

Yeah "I'm defending PizzaGate" - What the fuck have you done to bring awreness to this? Oh yeah absolutely fucking nothing, so shut the fuck up you fucking moron. "I am defending PizzaGate". Give me a fucking break. Seriously you have done not a damn thing to help at all. I see 0 posts written by you exposing PizzaGate or PedoGate, in my opinion your silence on the matter is consent. You have not even re-steemed a single important piece of information on this. So who the fuck are you to talk to me about "defending PizzaGate". You are one of the dumbest fucking people I have ever come across on Steemit.

Yeah you are great source of "education". Here is a piece of advice from me:

Don't go around trying to tell other people what to say. You have no fucking right to tell me a thing. You have no response for the valid criticism I levied at Seaman because you didn't even listen or address it. If you have no actual valid response to the criticism except to try and tell me I am not allowed to criticize someone, then my response is this:

Yeah "I'm defending PizzaGate" - What the fuck have you done to bring awreness to this? Oh yeah absolutely fucking nothing, so shut the fuck up you fucking moron.

Wow. I gave you credit for being a decent human being trying to do some good and offered some constructive criticism (that others have also suggested to you) and you choose this as your response?

Even worse, you have chosen to attack my comment on the fallacy you created (pointing out facts about someone = defending them) by creating a strawman to attack, as if my comment below is actually stating that "you're defending PizzaGate"?

Pointing out facts about someone ≠ defending them. By that logic you're defending PizzaGate.

Your reaction to this is simply baffling. Someone offers some information to you on a person you are "exposing" and let's you know that by going after that person that doesn't deserve attention that you're only hurting your own message and you choose to ignore the criticism/advice and attack the person.

WTF???

I was completely wrong about you, as I'm sure many others will soon come to learn. You are an immature human being that cannot accept some simple criticism and guidance from people that have supported your efforts and are trying to help.

BTW, welcome to David Seaman's world of obscurity after that epic credibility killing post! At least he had enough foresight not to go batshit crazy on a blockchain. So props to him for that I guess.

Will this be the "Titusfrost Exposed!" post. lulz

Yeah you got me: I have been totally exposed. Look at all your upvotes. ROFL =>

Yeah you got me: I have been totally exposed. Look at all your upvotes. ROFL

People here are intelligent enough to look at a persons character, not upvotes.

I'm still confused about why you're so angry and calling people faggots and making up things that didn't happen in an effort to give yourself a point to argue.

Have you carefully read anything written above or are you just blindly responding and reading into it things that aren't there just so you can feel like someone is attacking you? Does that somehow give you "credibility"?

I just don't get it. You blame DS for you losing donations, but you can't seem to see that perhaps it has more to do with how you treat other people. At first I thought this was an isolated incident, but I've read some of your comments and this is apparently your personality full-time.

A lot of good people here have been supporting you for your efforts, including us, and from what we can tell you lack a sense of decorum when dealing with the public; which sheds a bad light not only on you, but everyone in alternative media.

People in alternative media that lash out at others by cursing, name calling, creating straw man arguments and logical fallacies as you do repeatedly, take another notch of credibility away in the minds of the masses from anyone bearing the "alternative media" flag.

No one attacked you here, no one told you who you could or couldn't interview, no one said you're defending Pizzagate.

No one's keeping a tally on upvotes, it's not a competition; but if you'd like to look and tally them up I think you'll find you're way behind on both upvotes, earnings and reputation. =`)

No one's keeping a tally on how many articles have been posted on Pizzagate, there is no competition; but if you'd like to look we've covered human trafficking/sex crimes/pedophilia stories many times and for many years before you popped up onto the scene calling people faggots and things you don't understand yet as "bullshit!".

We've also written and reblogged many articles on the topics here on Steemit, our mutual blog and our personal blogs. But we have likely excluded yours due to the sensationalism and conjecture that detracts from the good work you have done and discourages those seeking out alternative media for the first time.

I hope you come to your senses sooner or later and realize that the only person attacking you in this thread is YOU. =`)

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.28
TRX 0.24
JST 0.040
BTC 95039.09
ETH 3310.57
USDT 1.00
SBD 7.23