You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: High Curation Rewards When Upvoting TribeSteemUp Members | First Proof
Means to vote on other people's posts is not at all detrimental.
The calculation of payment is not fully understood, but reading the explanation I understand better now.
I am waiting for post about SP delegation rent, whether it is beneficial for tenant or vice versa.
As a beginner in Steemit, many of which I have not understood.
Yeah, Steem/Steemit can be complicated. SP delegation is usually profitable but you will not grow your community/audience/respect on Steemit. You are also missing out on the Steem power you could earn by curating. Of course this is polarized and doesn't explain the whole picture. But I believe what goes around, comes around!
This bears repeating:
It's very nice to see concrete numbers on a profitable alternative to blind delegation. I am not (yet) powered-up enough to have really needed to think about delegating, but I like that there are alternatives, particularly ones which can foster community growth on deliberately chosen topics. If you accept that the long -term value of steem rests on the quality of the content, then it's also plausible that voting like you're suggesting makes is economically more rational than blind delegation. I'll be taking a deep look at some of my auto/habitual votes in the next few days.