You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Zorker's Steemit Lessons: Getting @Curie's Attention
Thanks for your kind words about Curie.
I wanted to clarify/add couple things you mentioned.
As you mentioned there are smaller and bigger votes. Curie's main curation is usually the one with bigger votes. They way it works is, curators independently scout the platform and submit awesome posts they find and reviewers do the reviewing. There is no community discussion of individual posts.
Curie also supports regional and interest-based sub-communities such as gaming, homesteading, education, music, etc. When you see smaller upvotes they are normally as a result of the sub-community curation.
I'm glad @geekgirl clarified. I would add that if people want to know how to get their work curied, they should check the posts on https://www.becquerel.io to see the standard that is required. I'm also attaching the most recent curator guidelines from the curie discord server (which anyone is able to join).
I also like your Chuck Norris analogy. As you can see, this post attracted the attention of several curie curators.
Huge thank yous to both @geekgirl and @choogirl for chiming in on this! I'm both amazed and humbled this got the attention it did, but also happy to know I didn't get too much wrong. :)
Just out of curiosity, does this post itself technically violate Guidelie 4, since it's basically about Steemit? Or is that not the case, since it's dealing with a sub-section of culture and not the platform itself?
Yes, it would be considered as steemit/steem related. Just like your title says "Steemit lessons" :)