Curie Weekly Update (30th Jan 2017 to 6th Feb 2017) - Special Edition, Unified Curation @ curiesteem.com
In spirit of Curie's transparency, we wish to use this weekly section as an ongoing development blog on our project to communicate our progress on top of the many casual exchanges happening in channel #curie.
- For those new to Curie, please follow @curie, and join us in #curie on Steemit.chat.
- We invite curators to submit posts from new authors in http://curiesteem.com. A finder's fee of 8 Steem is available for each upvoted post.
- Follow @curie's votes to support the authors. Please consider following our trail and voting for curated authors. If you are a Streemian user, @curie is an available trail to follow.
- Curie continues its focus on supporting new authors. Semi-established authors are supported by Steem Guild.
- Remember to follow and interact with authors that you love going through The Daily Curie.
Important News
Please check out our recent important announcement: https://steemit.com/curation/@curie/curie-and-community-an-open-invitation-for-all-to-be-part-of-our-curation-works-powered-by-streemian
An approval rating of min 40% is required to maintain as a regular curator.
Also, take note that we are currently increasing the bar for quality curation. Below is the list of posts that would NOT be voted on by @curie:-
- Poetry posts unless they are particularly unique
- Recipe posts unless they have pictures documenting the process; and some originality to the recipe
- In case of frequently posted series (e.g. a daily series), vote one in three editions (Unless it's a good fiction series or something like that)
- Art/craft type posts unless it's exception or there's a progression documented
- Fact based posts without proper citations and references
- Non-original content unless it's a substantial curation with their opinion
- Authors milking the same topic
- Dumping reposts from older blogs / youtube channel etc.
Weekly Statistics
Over the last week, Project Curie curated a total of 463 posts at an average of 66 posts per day. A total of 320 unique authors were rewarded. The numbers dipped compared to previous week due to our frontend testing, having shifted to http://curiesteem.com.
SBD 7,647 was generated at an average of SBD 16.50 per post.
Authors
The Top 20 Authors by payouts last week were -
- @art21
- @karthikrao
- @bitcoinparadise
- @meysam
- @catharcissism
- @kristinaljfom
- @ogochukwu
- @badquakerdotcom
- @fisteganos
- @commonguru
- @vir
- @enigma84
- @rubens9119
- @melania
- @paolobeneforti
- @dovetail
- @deadmosco
- @oceansoul13
- @pinguart
- @puffosiffredi
#curie @ https://steemit.chat/channel/curie
Now that we've unified our curation, please note that the Top 12 Curator list will dynamically change every other week depending on performance. Anybody will be able to rise up the ranks with consistent, quality curation. Inconsistent, low quality curation will result in dropping out of Top 12 (or regular curation if under-performance continues).
This week, we have upvoted 402 posts submitted by curators in http://curiesteem.com, with 3,216 STEEM paid out / pending payouts to curators.
Curation Leaderboard
| Curator | Curation Score | Approval Rating |
|---|---|---|
| @liberosist | 48.8 | 88.7 |
| @alcibiades | 31.2 | 91.9 |
| @naquoya | 27.6 | 65.6 |
| @littlemozart | 22.5 | 75 |
| @jewierart | 19.9 | 82.8 |
| @teofilex11 | 15.8 | 75 |
| @fubar-bdhr | 15.4 | 76.9 |
| @pfunk | 10 | 100 |
| @norbu | 7.4 | 81.8 |
| @kevinwong | 6.2 | 69.2 |
| @shenanigator | 6.1 | 87.5 |
| @lpfaust | 6 | 100 |
Join us in #curie on Steemit.chat, vote for @curie as witness and follow us @curie!
Great work guys. Proud of y'all.
thank you @curie
your support is actually what makes new authors like me not to give up and try to continue creating high quality posts.
Great stats that underlines the importance of your work and its actual repercussions on us all! Good for you, good for us all! Namaste :)
This post has been ranked within the top 25 most undervalued posts in the second half of Feb 06. We estimate that this post is undervalued by $21.92 as compared to a scenario in which every voter had an equal say.
See the full rankings and details in The Daily Tribune: Feb 06 - Part II. You can also read about some of our methodology, data analysis and technical details in our initial post.
If you are the author and would prefer not to receive these comments, simply reply "Stop" to this comment.