Debatable Dangers 2

in #culture2 years ago

Not too long ago I wrote a post on the risks and pitfalls used by smart people in public debates. We discussed how this kind of discussion, often performed before a life audience, carries with it the risk that the winner in the debate is seen by the audience as the one telling the truth.


You can read that post right here: Debatable Dangers. This is a short follow-up, just to cover one or two points not covered in that post. The audience, for example, plays a pivotal role in these debates. This is because there's little to no chance at all that you'll change the mind of your ideological opponent in this one discussion. That's not to say you shouldn't try, but you should understand that you probably won't, even when you're the one holding all the factually correct positions. And this is where the rhetorical tricks come in; in a public debate it should be your aim to win, not to change the mind of your opponent, but to potentially change the mind of a couple of audience members. And unfortunately this means using any trick you can get away with.

One of those tricks is actually simple; be honest. Not necessarily in your use of rhetorical tricks, but in the admission of the limits of your knowledge and expertise. This is an offensive as well as a defensive tactic. It's offensive in the sense that you paint yourself as humble and you leave open the opportunity for your opponent to be able to change your mind. But it simultaneously closes off an avenue for your opponent to make you look like a fool by being able to correct you on subjects you clearly don't know too much about. Notice how all this has nothing to do with finding common truths through the honest exchange of ideas, as discussed in the previous post, and everything to do with simply winning the rhetorical contest; this goes back to the point about the significance of the audience.

In closing, I think it's important to know about these things, to be aware of them when watching politicians or YouTubers debate each other. Don't take anything for granted and never assume that either party is the holder of the absolute truth on any topic. Debates are, unless you're one of the participants, usually a spectacle with the aim to bend your opinion one way or the other. It's vital to understand that winning or losing in such debates is not indicative of the veracity of any argument brought forward by either side. You'll have to see through the confident postures, the snappy responses (that usually amount to profoundly empty slogans with the sole purpose of teasing a reaction out of the audience) and the logical fallacies applied; not an easy thing to do at all, but it all starts with awareness, understanding what you're actually looking at. Again, just because he's such an obvious example and actually rather good at what he does, we take a look at Ben Shapiro's tactics. This time the video takes a look at his "10 Tips for debating leftists"; all great tips if the only aim is indeed victory in the debate;

A Leftist's Response to Ben's Ten Tips + Tips for Debating Conservatives

Thanks so much for visiting my blog and reading my posts dear reader, I appreciate that a lot :-) If you like my content, please consider leaving a comment, upvote or resteem. I'll be back here tomorrow and sincerely hope you'll join me. Until then, keep steeming!

wave-13 divider odrau steem

Recent articles you might be interested in:

Latest article >>>>>>>>>>>Billionaire Crybabies
Democracy's Last GaspOur Time On Earth
Debatable DangersIt's The Best We Can Do
Separating The HemispheresDune And The Thinking Machines

wave-13 divider odrau steem

Thanks for stopping by and reading. If you really liked this content, if you disagree (or if you do agree), please leave a comment. Of course, upvotes, follows, resteems are all greatly appreciated, but nothing brings me and you more growth than sharing our ideas. It's what Steemit is made for!

I am a proud helpinaut! @Helpie is looking for new members! Helpie has been growing nicely and we are always on the lookout for new valuable members. We are very supportive and community oriented. If you would like to be scouted for @helpie , please drop a comment on THIS POST or contact @paintingangels on discord at paintingangels(serena)#3668.

wave-13 divider odrau steem

Just for Full Disclosure, I'm invested in these crypto-currencies:

Bitcoin | Litecoin | EOS | OmiseGo | FunFair | KIN | Pillar | DENT | Polymath | XDCE | 0x | Decred | Ethereum | Carmel | XYO

wave-13 divider odrau steem

@helpie is a WITNESS now! So please help @helpie help you by voting for us here!Helpie_01.png


Hi @zyx066!

Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your UA account score is currently 3.896 which ranks you at #4553 across all Steem accounts.
Your rank has not changed in the last three days.

In our last Algorithmic Curation Round, consisting of 79 contributions, your post is ranked at #14.

Evaluation of your UA score:
  • You're on the right track, try to gather more followers.
  • The readers appreciate your great work!
  • Try to work on user engagement: the more people that interact with you via the comments, the higher your UA score!

Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server

Hello. Currently there are a lot of curation groups and whales curating amazing content, there's no need to buy votes. The downvote you received is to discourage the buying of votes from bidbots. We kindly invite you to join us on the #NewSteem attitude, where good content receives votes and the organic content get the most attention. Buying votes hurts you, other authors and the Steem Ecosystem in general, please don't do it.