RE: You can't make this shit up. It's literally Lucifer-coin. A coin with the Sigil of Lucifer as a logo and the name Morningstar (another name for Lucifer)
Excellent Work there n_ & v_.
Spot On!
I'll mention this on ZH-Zerohedge as soon as an appropriate/related story connected to 'cryptos' comes up today.
Without a doubt, evil intent IS behind the original i.e. bitcoin.
Otherwise, it would have been shutdown immediately by the TPTB.
Personally, I believe bitcoin was established as "a dry run" test & refine template project by TPTB.
The actual "bitcoin mining" going on is actually in reality only a part of the TPTB:s "data mining" which, is in its turn is being processed, quantified and utilized by quant-computers We normal everyday folks can only dream of.
That way the TPTB can perfect their own FSD-Full Spectrum Dominance system before introducing it to the sheeple.
That's right.
Full Digital tyranny, brought to you by the transhumanistic NWO.
The BS-arguement that guys like Clif High use saying people who use bitcoin are Innovators just to pr-sales pitch it to the sheeple, cannot hide the fact that with every transaction there is ALWAYS a winner and a loser.
Greed, in my opinion is a lose-lose proposition.
It begets Evil.
This lucifer-coin is 1 more confirmation pointing to that.
Many elements in the cryptosphere are not based on pure intent.
That's my 2 cents for crypto-currencies.
Cheers X-
I have had my doubts about crypto, but the more I learned, the more they dissolved...
There is nothing that goes more against the globalist control system (the empire, if you will) than decentralization. Control, whether by the government or whatever shady group you prefer, is only possible through centralization. Indeed, centralization is the very structure of control and rule. What on Earth would be the bloody point in giving decentralizing technology to the people? Now, I agree that tptb would attack crypto if it was against their agenda.
The problem is, how? It's decentralized nature makes this very difficult and the only way to attack it is to keep volatility up in order to keep people from adopting it. How could this be done? Through the media and through strategic trade. I like myself some critical out of the box thinking, but once we see evil in literally everything, we might want to take a good look at ourselves.
Thanks a lot for your input. I've tried to address your point in the comment below. My view is that although there may be a number of good decentralized privacy coins out there, the intent will be to slowly scrap these types of coins and get the masses on coins that are centralized, controlled, and run by corporate, government, and big money interests. They have trillions of dollars to lose. Trust me, they will not let this money leave their hands unless it means they are going to make much more somewhere else. They also won't allow control of the world to leave their hands either. They are not that incompetent and they certainly are not threatened by the measly $150 billion crypto market. This is chump change for them.
Thanks a lot X-. I certainly believe that cryptos have been seeded to get us all into digital currencies. This has always been part of the "Great Work" plan, but they needed either a carrot, a stick, or both to get us there. What better way to get the populace on to cryptos then to seed them, and then to pump them behind the scenes while allowing a lot of people to get rich off of them. Of course the already impoverished populace would flock to them. Why wouldn't they?
Add to this the fact that the governments (other than China - which is temporary) have not really interfered with cryptos at all. This is not just a coincidence. They would never allow this unless it was part of the agreed plan at a higher level. Sure, they'll throw up a bit pushback now and then to keep up the show, but I'm convinced they know it's all part of the plan.
So the typical counter-argument will be that cryptos are all about freedom and decentralization. Let's take Bitcoin as an example. Bitcoin is decentralized in theory, but almost all the miners are concentrated in a few major mining groups in China. This isn't decentralization, it's domination. Ethereum is very centralized despite what they want people to believe. Bitcoin Cash is even worse than Bitcoin. Ripple is absolutely centralized. These are the top coins in the marketplace. No wonder they get so much attention and money - they are all already fully controlled. Sure there are a number of other excellent coins that are not controlled in the same manner, but they are peanuts in size comparison. This is not a coincidence.
My belief is that the cryptos are needed as part of the grand plan for a global technocratic dystopian state that "the powers that shouldn't be" have planned for us. Those that want to go deeper down the rabbit hole can read more about what that future dystopian state looks like here. I'm not against cryptos by any stretch of the imagination, but I'm also not deceived by the true long term plan for them either.
I placed a link again today at ZH-Zerohedge today here: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-09-22/bitcoin-slides-after-dimon-doubles-down-cryptocurrency-concerns-it-will-end-badly#comment-10313521
I figure ca 230 have used today & yesterday's links to your story.
Thanks and keep up the good work.
X-
Very cool. Thanks again X-V. It got a lot of hits today. It's up to about 300 views now.