Facebook Libra: Good or Bad??

in #crypto5 years ago

I'll be the first to admit. I'm not nearly as crypto savvy as I'd like to be at the moment. So I'm turning to the amazing and supportive Steemit community to help give me the lowdown on Facebook's new moves into the world of cryptocurrency and what broader implications it could have for steemit itself..

Facebook Libra.png
src

Obviously Zuckerberg's announcement earlier this week that Facebook was planning on adopting it's own form of a global blockchain run currency known as Project Libra rocked the boat with many. It definitely had a LOT of lawmakers alarmed, with Republicans and Democrats alike calling for a halt on the project pending further analysis. House Financial Services Committee Chairwoman Maxine Waters (D-CA) said in a statement yesterday:

“Given the company’s troubled past, I am requesting that Facebook agree to a moratorium on any movement forward on developing a cryptocurrency until Congress and regulators have the opportunity to examine these issues and take action.”

These policymakers are visually shaken and unnerved by what they see as Facebook's continued unchecked expansion and extended reach into the lives of it 2.5 billion users.

maxine waters.jpg
src

Experts that have been interview within the blockchain industry, and subreddits alike, are divided over this divisive issue.. Some believe that it heralds a broader mainstream adoption of crypto in everyday use, which is an additive for all cryptocurrencies in general. Indeed this week has seen bitcoin prices surge 2.5% yet again today and its over 150% YTD!

Other's aren't so optimistic, voicing fears that Libra is likely to fail and the fallout will have disastrous implications for the rest of the blockchain industry. If that happens, the backlash from the public might very well be the nail in blockchain.

Most people seem to be observing the moves Libra makes from afar, but are on the whole unconcerned either way. Facebook's plans for using the blockchain seem to be more in competition with fiat currency and banks than with truly decentralized cryptocurrencies. Facebook seems to be taking aim at money wire type transaction companies, like Paypal or Venmo who take advantage by charging an exorbitant transaction fee.


src

Facebook and partner company Calibra (which makes and is the wallet for Libra) do seem to have a challenge moving forward to prove that the currency remain censorship free, as well as allay concerns about tax implications and Facebook's history of allowing government meddling..

Facebook, which has maneuvered backers to invest $10million apiece to serve as a reserve for the currency, will most likely use its advantage to monitor the blockchain, track transaction/shopping behavior, and market that data to advertisers. Also, giving easy access of purchasing power to those who don't have credit cards or even a bank, does seem rather risky.. if not for Facebook, for the user..

I can see comprehensive marketing campaign customized to the individual user, combined with the "one-click" purchase style in app integration, financially ruining more than a few under-prepared netizens..

As for it's effect on us over here on Steemit.. I guess time will tell. SBD seems to be holding its own.. so ::fingers-crossed::


src

What about you? What do you think about Facebook throwing its hat into the blockchain ring with Libra? Will there be massive repercussions on the industry, or is it something to observe with mild amusement? Is it's implementation even be plausible?? Weigh-in with your thoughts to enlighten me and our readers in the comments below!

Until Then..

Sort:  

I believe this coin is a lame attempt by Facebook to jump on the crypto currencies. Yes, even though the company recruited numerous expert researchers and a knowledgeable development team to work on this project, it will ultimately wind up either lagging behind true crypts or just failing altogether.

Any coin that is developed and controlled by a company will not be decentralized. Even if billions of Facebook users start using the coin, it will not have all the advantages of a decentralized cryptocurrency.

I have said this on other posts of this topic but i fear that Libra could be a big bank / government / corporate conspiracy to create this coin, have something terrible happen to the user's money, and then use this as reasoning for why crypto is bad and should be illegal. They already tried this approach by suggesting that crypto is used only for drugs and weapons and that didn't work....

Maybe I am too paranoid, but I just don't trust FB being in charge of anything other than FB.

However, i could be (I hope) totally wrong and Libra could be the bump crypto needs to become more mainstream... i don't know if this is a good thing or not. For now, i know it is beyond my control and we'll just have to wait and see!

It is worrisome that they are branding Libra as a cryptocurrency.. the only thing it seems to have in common with crypto is that it operates on blockchain.. but with it's value being pegged to the dollar, it not being deregulated, decentralized and uncensored.. it seems more like Apple pay.. I saw someone say they should call it "Zucks"

.. like hey, can you loan me 10 Zucks..

If it does fail, the media, and government will be all over it as reasons why crypto in general is doomed to fail.. not sure about conspiracy, but it does seem odd they way they are marketing it right now..

To listen to the audio version of this article click on the play image.

Brought to you by @tts. If you find it useful please consider upvoting this reply.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.19
TRX 0.15
JST 0.029
BTC 63239.86
ETH 2621.03
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.77