Lose money with crypto? - Must watch
Note: The snapshot is on the 15th with actual receiving of the coins a week or so later when the wallet launches.
Learn more here: https://smartcash.cc/announcing-the-airdrop-and-release-of-bitcoin-confidential/
Learn more here: https://bitcoinconfidential.cc/
Want to help me finally free America from the federal government?
http://KokeshForPresident.com
Get the MOST IMPORTANT BOOK EVER for FREE in every format including audiobook at http://thefreedomline.com/freedom
Please support FREEDOM! by liking and sharing this video, subscribing, and sharing!
Then for everything else:
http://TheFreedomLine.com
▶️ DTube
▶️ IPFS
haha, good point that the way someone talks about Bitcoin tells you a lot about them
(works the other way too: if someone is a hardcore Keynesian, it's bonkers to listen to them talk about what Bitcoin is and why it has value)
re: Bitcoin Maximalism and "first to market"...
It's a different concept than how products and companies come to market.
I think of Bitcoin as "discovered" rather than built or created. Satoshi discovered a mathematical property that was natural to our world.
It's the property of how you can pass information in a way that's authentic and without 3rd party oversight.
Like the wheel or anything else, there isn't an improvement on that property.
The discovery itself is just perfect.
Then you name and pick the specs that the network will use. These are arbitrary to the creator and could have issues.
But the improved specs would have to have some material difference. (People won't switch networks because supply of 24 million has a prettier buzz to it or something. Only if the new spec caused a materially better outcome.)
So then it's a question of if there exists any issue like that where there's room for something like this to be a thing.
And then.. if some improvement or issue is clear enough to move a critical mass to a new network, it would be clear what Bitcoin needs. And hopefully then they'd soft fork it into Bitcoin rather than the migration happens.
The mechanics of it oddly seem to dictate that it's trenched in pretty good.
We do need to settle on one chain at some point. No one will trust it enough to build things on it and train their companies to accept it and store wealth in it if it seems like it will switch to whatever hawt new thing next week.
So I tend to think everyone should have a "maximalist" view of whatever network they're saying to use.
Nobody wants your scammy ass, creepy stalker bullshit here.
This guy’s campaign targeted me and my family, and has threatened and pressure several others, including children.
https://steemit.com/kokesh/@kafkanarchy84/direct-admission-of-guilt-from-kokesh-campaign
Thank you! The admission that the screenshots from @benfarmer (then Kokesh chief campaign strategist) are authentic is around the 52-minute mark. Screenshots discussing stalking me, geolocating me and “teams of programmers” and “assets” in Japan to fuck up my life because, quote: “He’s really fucking with our money over on Steemit.” How, you ask, was I “fucking with their money”? I wrote articles about inconsistencies and strange practices I saw coming from the campaign, and they lost funding. You know. Free speech. Their response: A cyberterror campaign. Luckily, one they were too inept to pull off.
Marcus here (@marcus.pulis) is the acting “Offical Press Secretary) of the campaign. When I asked about the screenshots he mocked me and for some reason likes to focus on my body?
These guys are sick, creepy individuals. But at least they stupidly admit their own crimes openly.
You have to be a real lowlife to target a man with a family. Or 9-year-old kids.
Thanks, Marcus ❤️✌🏽😎
The screenshot may be a gun, but it is not a smoking gun. More evidence is needed to convince me 100%.
A non answer. No address of bullet points mentioned in screenshots. As expected. Thank you. I know to now dismiss any forthcoming remarks as inane.
There is evidence that he was contemplating methods of solving the issue that they had. Methods that were against the NAP even. But I am not convinced that he did anything about it. It's like saying, if someone constantly harasses me to my face I may contemplate using violence and smacking him in the face, I might even say that I would do it, but until I do, it doesn't mean anything. And also, where is the evidence that this was initiated by Adam? Blaming Adam for what Ben was thinking about is what is inane.
You’re right bro. Those neo-nazis were just hiring people to lynch blacks. They didn’t go through with it. No harm, no foul, am I right?
I can’t believe people this foolish actually exist.
Yes, no harm, no foul.
Are you saying that if you harassed me to the point that I was thinking of using violence against you, then I would be the bad guy?
You beat me to it, thanks. No one should be convicted with evidence that wouldn't hold up in a court of law.
How many Dutch tulips can you buy for 70,000 Zimbabwean Reichsmarks? Asking for Charles Kokesh.