RE: Attention-Based Stigmergic Distributed Collaborative Organizations
Who's the idiot that downvoted this topic? 1 down vote cost Dana $1,100?
Are you seriously asking those of us who care about quality content to go somewhere else?
It's completely on topic and targets the majority of community members, even if the people interested in it aren't necessarily whales.
Seriously guys, flagging is for spam and abuse, not because you think a posting is overrated or have a grudge. Using it for anything else is abusing the system.
@Dan come on man, please require that flagging require both a name and a comment, so we can know who these guys are at least and why. You said yourself that bagholders would always act in the best interests of the coin, but how is abusing the flagging system in the best interests of coin? Make them be as public as the upvoters at least, please! That way they at least have their reputation and curation on the line.
Otherwise the flagging system is going to be abused by people who are jealous and have nothing to risk at all. Yeah it might trigger mod wars, but at the very least, the community should have the right to give back the money to the person who earned even if someone is jealous and doesn't feel like they deserve it.
Anyone else agree with me about this?
I agree, the idiot is @smooth and @smooth.witness
same whale with two accounts
I agree with you. There have been many article I have seen that someone has flagged and for the life of me I couldn't see why. I always wanted to know who these people are flagging articles. Maybe it is my sense of "your right to know your accuser". It's the same reason I feel that there should not be any "anonymous" tips to the police. Too easy to abuse the system.
If you are going to flag you should have the courage of your conviction. User names should accompany the flag. Maybe we should also be able to up and down vote the flagger. Flagging should be reserved to a limited set of circumstances.