Permit me to take you on a journalistic journey into a topic many choose not to cover due to the ickiness of said topic. But if we fail to address it, we ultimately fail our children and their future. As upsetting as the topic is, we must take into consideration that by bringing a spotlight where shadows lurk, we can halt the exploitation of children.
First off, I'd like to point out that the information I am sharing with you can be found easily online, as a reader has done; I am posting this on her behalf since I have a slightly longer reach. But ultimately getting the word out falls on everyone's shoulders, not just mine. I am sharing what was found, and framing it with the question of WHY DOES NOBODY CARE ABOUT THIS SHIT?
One of the lessons I've taught my kids is that words have meaning; words also have connotations. Things like "Raw and Uncut" typically refers to pornography. Using such language on a blog featuring infants is... weird. To say the least.
Sure, such phrases can also mean candid footage, like a blooper reel. But again, I pose the question as to why limited time access is being offered to view an infant online?
Now you may be asking yourself, just who is this person running that blog hawking webcam views of a baby using phrases commonly associated with pornography?
Her name is Tamera Luzzatto. In the Wikileaks scope of things, she's the woman who sent an invitation to several people, informing them that they'll be heating the pool and that three kids (names and ages listed) will be there for "entertainment." Yeah. You read that right. Those children are also listed in the second blog screenshot. This is how we know the woman running the blog is the same one offering the children as entertainment for a pool party.
But that's not the most interesting thing about her. To me, the fascinating thing about her is who she knows.
For example, when Hillary Clinton served as New York Senator, Tamera Luzzatto was her chief of staff. She was even offered the job with no interview.
So, just to be absolutely clear, the woman who served as Senator HRC's Chief of Staff offered her three step-grandkids as pool entertainment and had a blog offering views of an infant "raw and uncut."
Side note: Porn sites operating in the USA have to have a 2257 clause.
18 U.S.C. 2257 Records Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement In compliance with United States Code, Title 18, Section 2257, all models, actors, actresses and other persons who appear on in any visual depiction of actual sexually explicit conduct appearing or otherwise contained in or at this site were over the age of eighteen years at the time of the creation of such depictions and they appear here exclusively in roles depicting them as adults. All other visual depictions displayed on this Website are exempt from the provision of 18
U.S.C. section 2257 and 28 C.F.R. 75 because said they do not portray conduct as specifically listed in 18 U.S.C section 2256 (2) (A) through (D), but are merely depictions of non-sexually explicit nudity, or are depictions of simulated sexual conduct, or are otherwise exempt because the visual depictions were created prior to July 3, 1995. For (website) videos, records required to be maintained by this section are kept by the custodian of records at:(physical address) The owners and operators of this website believe its content to be non-obscene erotic expression protected by the First Amendment. The owners and operators of this website are not the primary producer (as the term is defined in 18 USC Section 2257) of any of the visual content contained in this website. This website primarily links to partner websites provided by other vendors and does not produce any content.The original records required pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 2257 and 28 C.F.R. 75 (address of record holder).
And no one seems alarmed by this. Why?
Perhaps it's because Tamera has a lot of connections. Let's take a look at her Facebook friends list, okay?
Please note the number of people associated with reporting, whom Tamera has on her friendlist. Notice the publications. And notice how those publications all push the Russia! narrative like there is no tomorrow.
Guess Russia won the coil toss.
But be aware, Kind Reader, that nasty things like a grandmother pimping out her granddaughter are hardly a new phenomenon. Mainstream media and those who own it, are complicit in covering up the truth. Take for instance, the Franklin Cover-Up.
News (especially when a reporter had ties to those at the heart of pimping out those kids) bombarded the airwaves with lies. Even Tom Brokaw failed to report the whole truth when covering the White House Call Boy scandal.
He reported that it was the use of credit cards to pay for the services as to why things went down. He failed to report that those "call boys" were flown in from the Midwest, between the ages of 13-15 and trafficked. They bypassed the whole child sex scandal to focus on financial.
More tasteful that way, I guess.
Operation Flicker found out that the Pentagon had over 5000 people associated with the purchase of child porn. Care to guess how many were investigated and arrested?
Ask yourself: Are you okay with elected officials having people with questionable ethics regarding children being part of their team? There's an adage: You're only as good as your friends. What does it say about the state of America when friends let friends prostitute children?
Why does this matter?
Aside from exploitation of children being wrong, it highlights how the media is complicit. We've heard the shit out of Russia, but we haven't heard that in the first month of Trump's presidency, there have been more arrests for human trafficking than in all of 2014 or 2015 for the same crime.