You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Why The Corona-Virus Probably Doesn't Exist | 2/3 - The TV Interview With All The Wild Claims (feat. Virologist Dr. Stefan Lanka, dubbed by Paradigm Prospector)
I linked you guys because I am not certain how known this narrative is in the truth circles out there. Would naturally appreciate your take and feedback whether you have ver heard this, and if so where <3
I think what I'll do is broach the occult, which is hidden right before our eyes in everything. Let's assign the color gray to the occult, white to good, and black to bad (or-vice-versa). The occult (or the hidden) exists independently and within both the black and the white. From my perspective, the world is less black and white, and more of a gradient grey moving from darker to lighter or lighter to darker depending on where you are standing or what you're considering. The occult lays hidden within the truths and the truths hidden within lies.
The above may sound like a lot of mumbo jumbo, so I'll throw out a few analogies to illustrate my point. A man in Florida stabs someone, and the individual dies shortly after. He goes to court where the prosecutor says: "So-and-so, the crazy knife-wielder (and bath salt enthusiast), murdered my client's family member with a knife!" Batshit crazy Mr. McStaby Stab, says in reply: "That's a blatant lie, your honor! The medical records clearly show that his client died of underlying hypotension."
So, who is telling the truth? Would it surprise you if I said both were telling the truth? Would it surprise you that the victim of Mr. McStaby was diagnosed the year prior with hypotension? So, Mr. McStaby is innocent, right? Well, that's not entirely true. You see, Mr. McStaby knicked an artery in the altercation and caused the victim to experience severe blood loss, or "low blood" pressure, which in and of itself had nothing to do with the underlying condition but has the same effect.
Surely that sounds like a ridiculous analogy, but I don't think it's any more ridiculous than police killing people with tasers and them blaming the cause of death on the victim's [insert random underlying condition] which caused them to experience a state of "excited delirium." People in society are programmed to let one of these bad actors get away with such a thing (murder), and I'll give you a hint, it's not Mr. McStaby.
But how does this all relate to Dr. Stefan Lanka and whether or not pathogenic viruses exist? I think that virologists and doctors are trained to detect smoke to find the fire (or virus). The phrase "where there's smoke, there's fire" is seen as a truism. But sometimes, where there's smoke, there's a fog machine. At other times, where there's smoke, there's dry ice submerged in water. So, what doctors and possibly virologists too are testing for, when looking for a virus, is unique antibodies that viruses summon from the immune system.
So, I don't know if Dr. Stefan is a charlatan like Mr. McStaby and the Cop who can't take responsibility for what they've done, or if he's really onto something. I can tell you this; I recently listened to an interview with Alex Jones and Dr. Tenpenny. She said something to the effect that antibodies aren't necessarily an indication of acquired immunity to a virus. This is pretty groundbreaking to me because if what she's saying is true, it significantly undermines vaccine logic.
Am I right in that the guy is claiming pathogenic viruses don't exist? He's saying that viruses don't cause disease? Is he saying that viruses are harmless and intentionally turning a blind eye to the fact that they may prompt a harmful and overactive immune response or an immune disease? I don't know what to say, but color me skeptical. I'm as equally inclined to research it as I am to dismiss it entirely. One thing is for certain; If he's playing games for notoriety, I'm going to be pissed-off at some random German dude whose neck I can't put my hands around. :-)
I look forward to your next post on the topic!
@thoughts-in-time
Worked on my reply to your detailed comment for more than 30 minutes, realized I need to get a better understanding of Lanka's takes before I dare to forward them. It's like seeing chemtrails for yourself, the first time in your life after having heard about them, and then joining a panel discussion a day later without being able to relay anything solid, other than mirky half-understanding. If you'll allow me a day or two I would love to get back to you with an actual response.
I will ink you in the proper response and get to your points as soon as I have caught up, and have actual internet connection again as I'm on the road right now.
For now: Thanks for your time putting your thoughts here man. It does help me a lot being able to compare the positions in perspective. Hear you in a bit.
For sure, it sounds like we're in the same boat with respect to this topic. I had an incredible sense of deja vu when writing this, I almost wonder if I replied to your first article on the topic in a similar manner. It's not the first I've thought about this guy, but then I forgot about him too quick before I made any progress into his claims. Look forward to hearing from ya!