in my opinion, downvotes should be reserved for plagiarism, spam and other negative influences to the community. Downvoting something simply because it is your opinion that it should have made less is of course your prerogative, just as it is my prerogative to describe your actions as shitty.
When it comes to payouts on Steemit, one should look at an author's posts as a collective. Some posts you spend hours on and make nothing, yet others you spend a little time on and make a lot. In the end, it seems to balance out based on the the overall performance of the author.
You know not of how hard this person has been working to build up their Steemit portfolio, and for you to choose to not only downvote their post, but write a comment that takes away from any time and effort they may have dedicated to this site is simply a shitty thing to do.
I would request that you unflag the post but it seems--luckily--that the influence you wield is all but inconsequential anyway.
in my opinion, downvotes should be reserved for plagiarism, spam and other negative influences to the community.
This is an interesting topic for discussion. I think that all holders of SP have the possibility to express their opinion on the height of reward for a particular post. The possibility is to either increase or decrease the payout. Both are valid from the blockchain's point of view.
Another aspect of downvoting is its common usage in this community. If you can point me to some discussion where people agreed on reserving downvotes only for "plagiarism, spam and other negative influences to the community", I'd be grateful to read it and update my future downvoting. However, this particular downvote falls into the "negative influence to the community" in my opinion, which means you didn't provide a valid reason for changing my mind.
When it comes to payouts on Steemit, one should look at an author's posts as a collective.
Steem allows voting on posts, not on all author's posts as a collective.
Some posts you spend hours on and make nothing, yet others you spend a little time on and make a lot.
This true and I like it so. You are not paid here for your effort but for the result.
In the end, it seems to balance out based on the the overall performance of the author.
You are right, this is exactly how it is! Sometimes you earn a lot, sometimes you don't. On average you earn the average.
(...) for you to choose to not only downvote their post, but write a comment that takes away from any time and effort they may have dedicated to this site is simply a shitty thing to do.
I wrote that comment later on request by the author as an explanation of the downvote.
@fulltimegeek It was a great post. I believe 9 of them. Only Noah's Ark has me sceptical because I've heard of similar "arks" arriving in Asia and Central America etc according to cultural lore. So I wonder if there may not have been more than 1. But I haven't listened to the real Indiana jones yet and will have to look at his evidence first ;-) Sorry I missed this post 23 days ago - I would definitely have upvoted it. Next time you post something like this please pop a link on my blog.
That's a shitty reason to downvote a post. Shame on you.
Maybe if you explained why instead of insulting my opinion, I might change it.
in my opinion, downvotes should be reserved for plagiarism, spam and other negative influences to the community. Downvoting something simply because it is your opinion that it should have made less is of course your prerogative, just as it is my prerogative to describe your actions as shitty.
When it comes to payouts on Steemit, one should look at an author's posts as a collective. Some posts you spend hours on and make nothing, yet others you spend a little time on and make a lot. In the end, it seems to balance out based on the the overall performance of the author.
You know not of how hard this person has been working to build up their Steemit portfolio, and for you to choose to not only downvote their post, but write a comment that takes away from any time and effort they may have dedicated to this site is simply a shitty thing to do.
I would request that you unflag the post but it seems--luckily--that the influence you wield is all but inconsequential anyway.
Thank you for your response.
This is an interesting topic for discussion. I think that all holders of SP have the possibility to express their opinion on the height of reward for a particular post. The possibility is to either increase or decrease the payout. Both are valid from the blockchain's point of view.
Another aspect of downvoting is its common usage in this community. If you can point me to some discussion where people agreed on reserving downvotes only for "plagiarism, spam and other negative influences to the community", I'd be grateful to read it and update my future downvoting. However, this particular downvote falls into the "negative influence to the community" in my opinion, which means you didn't provide a valid reason for changing my mind.
Steem allows voting on posts, not on all author's posts as a collective.
This true and I like it so. You are not paid here for your effort but for the result.
You are right, this is exactly how it is! Sometimes you earn a lot, sometimes you don't. On average you earn the average.
I wrote that comment later on request by the author as an explanation of the downvote.
It took me 6+ hours to make this post. It has a ton of pictures, sources, and I revised it like 10 times to make it flawless. What more do you want?
@fulltimegeek It was a great post. I believe 9 of them. Only Noah's Ark has me sceptical because I've heard of similar "arks" arriving in Asia and Central America etc according to cultural lore. So I wonder if there may not have been more than 1. But I haven't listened to the real Indiana jones yet and will have to look at his evidence first ;-) Sorry I missed this post 23 days ago - I would definitely have upvoted it. Next time you post something like this please pop a link on my blog.