RE: The Mother of all Conspiracy Theories - Part 7: "Resurrection"
Only the names have been changed to protect the guilty.
The problem with your analysis is that this isn't the first technologically advanced time period on this planet.
Babylon isn't that old.
But, you can consider that time loops, and thus the same actors try to do the same thing again.
One thing that is really... poor, missing... hurtful, harmful, about atheists is that they don't believe. They say they do not believe in God, and instead believe in "science". But really, what they are missing is the energy that is right in front of them. Scientism believes in a dead, mechanical world. And so, these atheists think nothing of the spells they are casting.
As you say, the imagery is all over the place. And these icons have power. But, to the non-believer, they are meaningless. And it is poor, that they are being affected, but they do not know, cannot know, because they don't place any meaning to it.
I don't see how this effects my theory at all. I have seen lectures about a massive civilization that lived in south africa with tons of ruins left over, that is supposedly dated at almost 300,000 BC. They seem also to have used advanced technology and worshiped a winged serpent. I wonder if a prolonged flood is the reason things seem to date so much older and appear that much more eroded, but if it is not, then there is your evidence that a civilization much akin to Nimrod's Babylon existed before, and it would help me very much in figuring out where Nimrod learned all the secrets of magic and the universe that he must have known.
Another commentor said a similar thing and it was not something I have considered any time recently. It's certainly what they seem to want us to believe as they are constantly showing us the ouroboros, and if true, then it makes sense that this story would take place 700 years after a flood. An even that we could well see happen again on Earth, and that was said to have been the downfall of several advanced civilizations.