Sort:  

I assure you it's above Curie's pay grade. Someone else's proxies are fighting things out. :)

@curie is listed as a voter? Actually, you voted on it as well @donkeypong

My votes are with Curie. If they voted it, I'll trust it had some redeeming value. Not going to bother checking, though.

lol, okay, I only singled you out, because of your comment about it being above curie's pay grade. Check it or not. It is a child's coloring and some dirty markers. :) Cheers, nothing personal in my post.

But we need the guilds!!!

Prozac for everyone.

You know, I hope, I haven't been for the guilds or any of the other Group voting schemes from the beginning.

Why do we need guilds?

We don't. They're a huge waste of resources and give users the wrong impression about what social media actually is. This isn't supposed to be a redistributionist scheme. Steemit isn't supposed to be a UBI.

That's an extreme reaction. There's nothing wrong with the idea of delegated curation; indeed it will be legitimized in Hardfork 17. Of course, like everything else, there'll be bad ones and good ones, while most will fit shades of grey. A redistributionist scheme is more debatable than a guild that seeks out content that adds value to and engages the Steemit community.

Streemian has a pretty good system set up. I'm looking forward to an open Guild which will act more as a content discovery platform. Vote on posts you like from the submissions, or not. That doesn't even need a delegation, in fact.

@ats-david was being sarcastic :)

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.16
TRX 0.15
JST 0.027
BTC 59476.67
ETH 2299.07
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.48