You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Htooms the benevolent whale
An errant conclusion derived from an improper interpretation of the facts. You've jumped to an unjustified conclusion yet again.
An errant conclusion derived from an improper interpretation of the facts. You've jumped to an unjustified conclusion yet again.
assumptive without reason or rhetoric to back it up.
Conjecture void of explanation and lacking rhetoric.
Come again.
Your premise that the timing of posts somehow proves they are the same person is faulty. That is why your conclusion is wrong.
How do I know your conclusion is wrong? I've interacted with both.