You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: An Argument for Caring

Believe it or not I appreciate you voicing your opinion. I personally think we should be talking about this subject more.
As you know, our understanding of mental illnesses is far from solid and has changed sometimes dramatically. I am reminded of seasonal affective disorder, which has ‘evolved’ quite a bit through the different versions of the D.S.M., from a diagnostic perspective, at least. Other changes are because of changing public and professional opinion. I am specifically thinking of homosexuality. We came to understand it better, more people spoke out to say - this isn’t right and now we no longer classify it as a psychological disorder.
We need to understand pedophilia better. We need to know more. I think our understanding of it will change over time as well, for better or for worse. I am looking forward to a greater understanding and hopefully better treatment options. There’s not a lot we can do to help someone with an attraction to underage children and that tells me we don’t know enough about it.
For me, at the heart of it, a child is a child, whether or not they’ve hit puberty. 11-12-13 year olds need to be recognized as being vulnerable to predation. Everyone I know who was targeted by a predator was during this age range, including myself. The doctor who molested me when I was 12 is not a healthy well adjusted person. I was still a clueless child! These predators, who molest kids, are sick people who deserve the label of pedophile or something equally deviant. They were/are dangerous people who destroyed lives for their own sick pleasure.
Thank you for contributing your knowledge and commenting on this article.

Sort:  

Gracie-gardener? I appreciate your reply, and I must admit that I am really happy that you replied to my post above in a civilized and polite manner. You would not believe how much hostility I have confronted whenever I have discussed this topic with anyone on the Internet. People have even made threats against me for disagreeing with them on this topic.

Gracie-gardener? I want to respond to your reply above, but I feel that I would be doing better justice in doing so by providing you with a response in the form of an article. In other words, instead of doing a response to your reply in the manner I normally would do so, I would like to provide you with a response in the form of an article inasmuch as I believe I would be able to address the contents of your reply in a much more effective manner than in the form of a regular response. However, I will only do my response to your reply in the form of an article if you are okay with it, because I would be quoting what you stated in your reply and I would be responding to each block of text therein accordingly. I would also be mentioning your name in the article, if you are okay with it. Then, afterwards, I would be sending you an alert that I have finished the article and have posted it, and, in the alert, I would be providing you with a link to the article to make it easy for you to pull it up on your computer screen. The way that I would be sending you an alert would be that I would place a post on this discussion thread, and it would include a link to the article. I just needed to know if you would be okay with this. I promise you that I will keep everything in my article friendly, civilized, and respectful. Would you be okay with this? Please let me know. :-)

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.18
TRX 0.13
JST 0.028
BTC 57142.21
ETH 2984.63
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.25