Sort:  

There are perfectly good definitions of capitalism in dictionaries and economic text books; I prefer not to define the inherent problems of capitalism away by distinguishing between "good" and "bad" capitalism. I like private property and voluntary trade, but that does not define capitalism, it is called capitalism for a reason, and I think there is a lot wrong with capitalism.
But I am not willing to discuss this until I come up with something better, in the anarchic, voluntary, distributed, semi-socialist, workers owning means of production individually or in self-chosen groups, freely trading and having private property direction (vague enough 8-), so let's agree to disagree here. It'off-topic anyway.

i see no issue with private property + voluntary exchange (capitalism free market). Where i see problem is when a centralization of force and coercion tries to get involved in those exchanges and prevent human beings from doing better in life. Not cool :p

That's just free market, and doesn't cover the core of what capitalism is. Accumulation of capital (that owns all means of production), which is what capitalism is about, in the textbook definitions, will always lead to "centralization of force and coercion" and localised poverty. Oh shit, now I am discussing it after all. Sorry, it won't happen again 8-). I'm off taking photos anyway.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.17
TRX 0.13
JST 0.028
BTC 59887.64
ETH 2670.13
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.47