CONFIRMED: FL Shooter Prescribed Psychiatric Drugs Linked to Violent and Suicidal Behavior

in #busy6 years ago

 Jacksonville, FL — David Katz, was a 24-year-old male who lost his  temper Sunday morning after losing a video game and began shooting up an  e-sports tournament. He killed two innocent people and wounded 10  others before her turned the gun on himself and took his own life. Now,  we have learned that Katz had been on the types of psychiatric  medications known to cause violent thoughts and that are linked to many  of the worst mass shootings in recent history. 

According to family divorce records, Katz had been in and out of  treatment for psychiatric issues since as early as the age of 12.  

According to a 2006 letter from the father’s attorney, as reported by CNN, Katz was prescribed a number of psychiatric medications, including an antipsychotic, and saw “a succession of psychiatrists.” What’s more, a separate 2006 court filing states that a therapist  said he had experienced a “psychiatric crisis” while prescribed these  medications. On top of the psychiatric crisis and the reported drug cocktail, CNN also obtained police records that show 26 calls for service to the police from the Katz family home  in Columbia, Maryland, from 1993 to 2009, for issues ranging from  “mental illness” to domestic disputes. 

At least two of those calls  involved Katz arguing with his mother, though none of the reports  provided to CNN show any physical violence. The Howard County Police  Department declined to release the reports from a number of the  incidents, citing statutory restrictions. David Katz’ past is eerily similar to that of Nikolas Cruz, except that his parents were both feds. Both of Katz’ parents reportedly worked for the federal government  according to a law enforcement source. 

Katz’ father, Richard Katz is a  NASA engineer employed at the Goddard Space Flight Center outside  Washington, DC and his mother was listed as an employee of the Food and  Drug Administration, according to CNN. Since he was a child, Katz was prescribed a myriad of drugs including  the antidepressant Lexapro, and Risperidone, sometimes used to treat  schizophrenia. 

There have been 20 drug regulatory agencies from seven different countries who’ve pointed out the dangerous side effects of Lexapro. The  majority of the warning are for suicidal risk or suicidal behavior.  Other side effects include, hostility or aggression, agitation, anxiety,  mania or psychosis, irritability, and violence. According to CNN, Katz’ father disputed the necessity of the drugs  and a psychiatric evaluation sought by David’s mother, suggesting that  his son instead “attend a support group for middle school students.”  

“Richard Katz has seen no evidence whatsoever of schizophrenia in David  Katz,” a motion from his father’s lawyer said. Despite the dozens of police reports stemming from Katz’ behavior,  the laundry list of drugs he was taking to treat his “psychiatric  crisis,” the fact that he was in treatment for psychiatric issues, and  the fact that it was documented that he’d had multiple mental breakdowns  involving the police, Katz submitted his fingerprints, underwent a  background check, passed a firearms safety training course and legally  purchased a 9mm handgun and a .45-caliber handgun in Maryland last  month. 

As TFTP has reported on numerous occasions, the majority of mass  shooters have links to psychological medications that carry serious  warnings for side-effects on their labels. Stephen PaddockOmar MateenGavin Long, Eric Harris, Dylan Klebold, James Holmes, and Nikolas Cruz,  all have one thing in common other than the mass murders they carried  out. They were all reportedly taking prescription drugs which alter  their state of mind and carry a host of negative side effects ranging  from aggression and suicide to homicidal ideation. There have been 150 studies in 17 countries on antidepressant-induced side effects. 

There have been 134 drug regulatory agency warnings from 11 countries and the EU warning about the dangerous side effects of antidepressants. Despite this deadly laundry list of potential reactions to these medications, their use has skyrocketed by 400% since 1988. 

Coincidentally, as antidepressant use went up, so did mass shootings. The website SSRIstories.org has been documenting the link between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and violence. On the website is a collection of over 6,000 stories  that have appeared in local media (newspapers, TV, scientific journals)  in which prescription drugs were mentioned and in which the drugs may  be linked to a variety of adverse outcomes including most of the mass  shootings which have taken place on US soil. As the Citizens Commission on Human Rights notes,  before the late nineteen-eighties, mass shootings and acts of senseless  violence were relatively unheard of. 

Prozac, the most well known SSRI  (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor) antidepressant, was not yet on  the market. When Prozac did arrive, it was marketed as a panacea for  depression which resulted in huge profits for its manufacturer Eli  Lilly. Of course other drug companies had to create their own cash cow  and followed suit by marketing their own SSRI antidepressants. 

Subsequently, mass shootings and other violent incidents  started to be reported.  More often than not, the common denominator was  that the shooters were on an antidepressant, or withdrawing from one.   This is not about an isolated incident or two but numerous shootings.
 

The issue of psychotropic medication playing a role in mass shootings  is not some conspiracy theory. It is very real and the drug  manufacturers list these potentially deadly side effects on the very  inserts of every one of these drugs. But the mainstream media and the  government continue to ignore or suppress this information. Why is that? It is no secret that the pharmaceutical industry wields immense  control over the government and the media. It is their control which  keeps any negative press about their dangerous products from airing.  However, most people likely do not know the scope of this control. 

As Mike Papantonio, attorney and host of the international television show America’s Lawyer, explains, with the exception of CBS, every major media outlet in the United States shares at least one board member with at least one pharmaceutical company.  To put that into perspective: These board members wake up, go to a  meeting at Merck or Pfizer, then they have their driver take them over  to a meeting with NBC to decide what kind of programming that network is  going to air.

 In the report below, Papantonio explains how the billions of dollars  big pharma gives to mainstream media outlets every year is used to keep  them subservient and complicit in covering up the slew of deadly side  effects from their products. 

Sort:  

Yup, the drug companies spend more on advertising on the MSM than the gun companies make total, thus there are no ads for guns on TV but almost every commercial break features drug ads. So when there is a shooting the put all the attention on guns and none on their drugs.

Despite the dozens of police reports stemming from Katz’ behavior, the laundry list of drugs he was taking to treat his “psychiatric crisis,” the fact that he was in treatment for psychiatric issues, and the fact that it was documented that he’d had multiple mental breakdowns involving the police, Katz submitted his fingerprints, underwent a background check, passed a firearms safety training course and legally purchased a 9mm handgun and a .45-caliber handgun in Maryland last month.

So let me get this right, you should have your basic rights stripped from you if you have been the subject of a police report?
And everyone who is on a psychiatric drug or in therapy should have their basic rights stripped from them? If that was the case why would anyone ever seek therapy? You seem to be suggesting that all mentally ill people are dangerous and should have their rights taken away without due process.
someone who has never been committed against their will, never been arrested much less convicted for any crime should have their rights taken?

If this guy was not allowed a legal gun do you think he would not have tried to kill anyone? He wouldn't have rented a Home Depot truck? He would not be able to hurt anyone if he didn't have a legal gun? Crazy people are too stupid to get them on the black market like teenage gang members?

No, that's not the solution, the solution is for the police to do their job and arrest this fuck if he is actually doing domestic violence and for the psychologists to do their job and to have this guy committed to a mental institute if he is a danger to himself or others.
In fucking Florida they can take someone's guns without even giving them due process, didn't they claim we needed to pass "red flag" laws to take peoples guns so this wouldn't happen again, gosh, how come this could happen again even with the law they claimed would prevent it?
meme5.jpg

Fed parents 🤔

A lot of these other alleged shooters had parents with significant involvement in hot things, like libor

The shootings in USA are really getting out of control in the last couple of years. Considering who runs everything, I doubt that anything will change.

mostly they just hype the incidents a lot, the total number of deaths is low, in fact in a single year in France more people were killed in large public mass shootings than during the entire Obama admin in the US.

Curated for #informationwar (by @wakeupnd)

  • Our purpose is to encourage posts discussing Information War, Propaganda, Disinformation and other false narratives. We currently have over 8,000 Steem Power and 20+ people following the curation trail to support our mission.

  • Join our discord and chat with 250+ fellow Informationwar Activists.

  • Join our brand new reddit! and start sharing your Steemit posts directly to The_IW, via the share button on your Steemit post!!!

  • Connect with fellow Informationwar writers in our Roll Call! InformationWar - Leadership/Contributing Writers/Supporters: Roll Call

Ways you can help the @informationwar

  • Upvote this comment.
  • Delegate Steem Power. 25 SP 50 SP 100 SP
  • Join the curation trail here.
  • Tutorials on all ways to support us and useful resources here

Maybe the mother will become an advocate for her son now and fight the corrupt FDA she works for that approved these horrible barbaric drugs in the first place!

That's not the first place. The first place is: why was he so broken that he needed those drugs?

There are a few ideas in my other comment.

You need to go one step further here and as: Why are so many young men in the US mentally disturbed. They might not have been born that way but made that way.

For example there is a correlation between circumcision and aggression and PTSD. But the US medical establishment doesn't want to look for a causation. If they found one they would loose a lucrative source of income.

There is also a correlation between raised by a single mother and aggression, including sexual aggressing. No one likes to look for a causation either. That would piss of the feminists.

Then there is lack of male teachers at US schools.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.21
TRX 0.13
JST 0.030
BTC 66785.43
ETH 3494.10
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.83