Blockchain Will Fail While blockchain Is SucceedingsteemCreated with Sketch.

in #busy7 years ago

What is Blockchain?

It is a mirage. A con. Snake oil.

It is not revolutionary. It is boring. It is a poor data structure.

It is expensive and, worst of all, it is not even warranted.

So what is blockchain?

That is a network of computers that create an open, decentralized ledger that is encrypted with cryptography with transactions being verified by unknown parties.

Blockchain is a fancy term used by the likes of IBM. They are charging companies millions of dollars to help establish "enterprise" Blockchains.

This is nothing more than a marketing term.

Sure they might actually be blocking things but who cares? The data structure of blockchain is not the most efficient. Effectively, IBM is charging big bucks to set up shared databases.

Put your business on the Blockchain. Why?

The truth is most data does not belong on blockchain, not at this time. Until there are advancements in technology, most belongs in centralized databases. As insecure as it is, the technology is not to the point where everything can safely be put out there. This might not be the case in a decade but it is today.

Existing blockchains serve a particular purpose. They have some features that make it very attractive for specific use cases. People who require something that is open and borderless find an ideal solution in blockchain. Since it is fairly immutable, those avoiding censorship are well served. This also means it excels at establishing trust while eliminating 3rd party risk.

image.png

Source

The Blockchain that IBM is selling does none of this. Control is not decentralized. Hence, this is a total folly. These companies are going to realize in a few years they spent millions of dollars on something that does not work.

What good is a blockchain if I am the one verifying the data and control the software?

Even what the banks are doing is a ruse (no surprise there). The 5 largest banks are creating a settlement system which they control. This is even worse than the present system which is a lot slower. Remember, these are the same mega banks that had a big hand in collapsing the global economy a decade ago. And now they are responsible for settling every transaction.

Does anyone else see how this is going to work out? People are going to find out how it is not smart to put one's trust in these entities.

Certainly, there are a lot of business use cases for blockchain. We are going to see many industries affected. Eventually, this could be one of the underlying technologies to most of the world's data. The idea of medical records on the blockchain is fabulous but not without privacy and a secure digital ID system. We do not have that yet. However, once that is achieved, we could see things like medical research explode since the data available will grow overnight.

Which brings us to a topic that affects Steemians: Facebook. What if they started their own Blockchain?

Once again, why?

They might do it yet I think it serves no purpose. Why do they need one? To create a coin? They could do that without it. Perhaps going the route of Blockchain would give people confidence in the token but, in the end, it would not matter. Facebook will control it all. They could update the software tripling the tokens instantly.

I read the catchphrase for 2019 is going to be "Distributed Ledger Technology". It is evident people are catching onto the "Blockchain" scam so they are not altering the name. Be very careful when a technology or movement is taken over by the marketers. Name changes usually mean we are dealing with a farce.

This is going to be an interesting sell since distributed ledgers were around for decades. IBM, ironically, had them going back to the 1970s. There is nothing revolutionary about this. In fact, why not just share out an excel spreadsheet? It is basically the same thing.

The bottom line is it all comes down to trust. If I do not trust you, it does not matter what format you put the data in if you are the one controlling it. It is impossible for me to know if it is valid or not I am dependent upon you to tell me the truth and am forced to take you at your word. In the world of big business, this is a dangerous proposition.

That is not to say that all "enterprise" projects fall into this category. There are a number of applications that are being developed for both businesses and governments to use. They are tied to public blockchains which have unknown parties verifying the transactions.

Some of these could be big winners in the future.

In the end, it will be the public blockchains that end up being used. It solves a basic human problem: trust.

As we all know, companies that act as trust agents charge a premium for their service.

This is what blockchain eliminates.


If you found this article informative, please give an upvote and resteem.

image.png

image.png

Sort:  

Great reading.
It also reminds me of one quote by Andreas Antonopoulos :

I If I would have a chance to give a name to Bitcoin - I would call it TRUSTNET

Well, maybe not exactly the same words. But... you got the idea

My friend works in a big tech business here in the UK and he's even told me about how businesses ask to be "on the blockchain". They then give them a standard, centralised solution and tell them it's blockchain and they're none-the-wiser!

At the end of the day, it's just a buzzword for some businesspeople.

It is a buzzword for SO MANY people today

excellent excellent article i dont think too many people realize this and i believe eventually 80 percent of everything will absolutley be on the blockchain once the technology is there and the bankers and govts hopefully slit their own throats in the process
keep up the amazing info taskmaster
i have some anti govt poems if you are into such things check them out you might get a kick out of a few of them
have an amazing day and again great article

taskmaster you seem to really know whats happeniong here check out qaurkchain and universa and let me know what you think
i think i would value your opinion fro the article you wrote here cheers and looking forward to your response cheers

While I agree that the public blockchains is what will ultimately expand and proliferate, have in mind that even certain private ones will flourish given how organizations will prefer streamlined AI to be run by them for back office processes done today by people. There will be room for both in the future.

Posted using Partiko iOS

To listen to the audio version of this article click on the play image.

Brought to you by @tts. If you find it useful please consider upvoting this reply.

Thank you so much for participating the Partiko Delegation Plan Round 1! We really appreciate your support! As part of the delegation benefits, we just gave you a 3.00% upvote! Together, let’s change the world!

Insightful

I had similar thoughts on company sized blockchain databases.

However, than i had a thought, what if finance didn't trust records, and ordering didn't trust sales, and...
And management didn't trust the workers, and the workers...

So, in such an environment, a blockchain, with full nodes running in each department, might actually fit the bill.

However, there is something better to do with a company that is managed so badly. Fire everyone. Shut the doors.

Oh! So true. It has become a marketing term to sell standard product in fancy packaging.
This reminds me of all the talk about Industry 4.0.
That is a reason why people don't trust these labels anymore. Sooner or later they find out that it's just sales talk.

Posted using Partiko Android

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.04
TRX 0.32
JST 0.081
BTC 61426.98
ETH 1631.00
USDT 1.00
SBD 0.42