RE: Steem Life Post HF22(21) #NewSteem
I don’t see what “we” did to anyone. The witnesses decided to change some things on the blockchain level, which has been done many times. We, those you are responding to here, are trying to make the best of it and help steer the community the right direction.
Your comment about “how does it feel” is short sighted, as how do you think it feels to buy and hold STEEM and watch it tank in value? It’s hard for everyone and some of us are trying to do is make the STEEM everyone holds worth more.
The shit on trending is being flagged, for the first time ever, and that means the rewards go back into the pool for those good authors. Now we need to work on content discovery and making sure that amazing content that is out there stops being ignored. That takes time, but for the first time (since I have been here), I see people actually working together to make it better... and that’s something I am going to get behind.
I don’t and didn’t support all these changes, but I very much can agree that something needed to be done or we would keep sinking. Sometimes change is hard and it takes time for these changes to balance out. No idea if they will work, but I’m going to work my hardest to help them work... because that benefits everyone here.
#newsteem is a new beginning, it’s up to us to decide where it goes next.
"I don’t see what “we” did to anyone. The witnesses decided to change some things"
Bullshit, steemit inc decided, steemit inc wrote the code, the witnesses follow like sheep, end of story!
she works for steemit inc , her job is to sell their bs
Sounds about true to form for this place.
Your going to get behind it then I suggest you go removed your vote from one of the articles on trending I mentioned.
I manually vote everything, if my vote is on a post it’s because I intended it to be. Feel free to use yours how you wish too.. my actions are on the chain and I stand behind them. 🙂
It's that kind of attitude sinking the ship, votes in all the wrong places. If I remember right, (if) it was the guy doing the rooftop video....if if is correct that's pretty horrendous.
It wasn’t, it was for the guy who runs a curation guild and I approve of the new guidelines. Maybe do a bit of research into your own accusations before you bring them here.
My flags are all over trending too.. and I would challenge “what I vote” up against pretty much anyone’s voting history and am confident I’d come out looking pretty great.
You’re now being ridiculous, so I’m done with this conversation.. going to go back to actually trying to help make a difference around here, for all our sake.
You’re welcome to join anytime, would love to have you.
I guess you missed the if, more than once if. I wasn't going to go through hundreds of votes to try and find it. No what that guy runs is nothing short of his own bidbot service disguised as a curation trail. No what he wrote was not worth the amount he bidded himself to. Go ahead and compare that to anything Taraz writes for under ten bucks then come back and tell me acidyo's critique of his new rules was worth nearly a hundred fifty bucks.
It's never going to be fair... ever. I will never understand how adults still are mad about fairness.
networking, friends, stake, content, mood, price, btc, recent news. All those thing impact the price. The best we can do is direct the rewards to those who are here and working on it.
May fail, may succeed. I don't pretend to know, but I can't imagine running around a platform I dislike and think is going to fail... just to tell people it's going to fail.
But if that is your thing...
Maybe because I can find the joys of life by interacting honestly instead of worrying about how I can get up on someone by cheating my way through life.
:) yeah. Making a decision to get along and make the best of a decision that wasn't mine to make is obviously, cheating.
Again, you are ridiculous.