Why did Latin die? "Busy"

The Latin language, which is currently being used in the world, has a certain period of reasons for the inability to preserve its presence as a language of speech.

Latin is not dead, it has evolved, so we can say it's not a reason why the Latin death.
I need to know if you say language, a writing language, a language of speech will come to mind. For example, in the time of Jesus, the writing was a language. If you spoke Hebrew, you wrote me. In the time of Muhammad, the writing language was Syriac, the historical significance of the Quran is the first written Arabic work that has traces of the Syriac spelling in the oldest copies found.

There is something that needs to be noted, languages that are related to the language of speech with these writing languages. Aramaic, Syriac, Arabic, Hebrew; They're all Sami languages. Of course, this is not always the case, for example, when the Turks use the cold scribes, the German princes speak Latin (Classical Latin), and German "Deustch" means the language of the people. But beware of relatives.

In the fall of Rome, the Latin of the writing language, which was destroyed, was classical. He continued to be used by the church, which inherited some of Rome's functions; Because the clerks are usually church-originated, the official language of the countries with a small horizon in Europe was still Latin. (For the same reason, the Mongols who use the Uighur scribe-the influence of the Ottoman, the Greek scribes, with the Turkish language, are Greek correspondence.) So you do not come across the name "Wladislaw" in the Old records, "Vladislaus", the authors of the Latin language, instead of the Jacobobus, Karl, the Carolus instead of Charles.

You can see a map of the Roman Empire interacting with cultures around it.
But the Latin spoken continued
This Latin was promoted to French in France, Spanish in Spain, Rurende (...) in Romania. Because languages evolve. In addition, substratum languages, i.e. before the arrival of the conquerors or the invaders of the local languages spoken in the region, also causes certain morphological transformations. So, in every region, other languages spoken in that region, the nations where the inhabitants interact with many parameters, such as those that we know are influenced by the Roma languages emerged. So we take the history of the French, the history of Italian, the beginning of the Middle Ages. You can't talk about French before 8th century. "Vulgar Latin", a folk Latin, has evolved into dozens of different languages when the transformation of every language is passed, and once the road system of Rome is eliminated, the trafficking and the theme of human communities in feudal divisions is reduced and the isolation begins.

The difference between the "right" ken, the Vulgar Latin (peasant Latin) and the Classical Latin, let's say, was the difference between the mouth of Erzurum or Artvin and the Istanbul Turkish language. However, imagine the writing of the petition with Istanbul and the end of the television broadcast. Imagine that Artvin and Antep's theme ended. Those mouth, dialect features are gradually evolved into the dialect, enough time passes, and the invasions of different languages, if the interactions engage in the language. In the 13th century, a man from Central Asia would be able to understand the Anatolian Turkish language much more easily, as it now understands very little.

Appendix: While Rome was standing, some features of the Vulgar Latin had already begun to affect classical Latin. Now I'm cold to look, but if I'm not mistaken, "C" is the "K" reading, "ç" has begun to be read, especially when it comes before the celebrities we call our narrow-thin celebrity.

The word is, he's not dead in Latin, he lives in our hearts.